Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32228403›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2020

Evaluation of scaffold microstructure and comparison of cell seeding methods using micro-computed tomography-based tools.

Aleksi Palmroth, Sanna Pitkänen, Markus Hannula, Kaarlo Paakinaho, Jari Hyttinen, Susanna Miettinen, Minna Kellomäki

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aleksi PalmrothBiomaterials and Tissue Engineering Group, BioMediTech, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Korkeakoulunkatu 3, 33720 Tampere, Finland.
Sanna PitkänenAdult Stem Cell Group, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Markus HannulaComputational Biophysics and Imaging Group, BioMediTech, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Kaarlo PaakinahoAdult Stem Cell Group, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Jari HyttinenComputational Biophysics and Imaging Group, BioMediTech, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Susanna MiettinenAdult Stem Cell Group, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Minna KellomäkiBiomaterials and Tissue Engineering Group, BioMediTech, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Korkeakoulunkatu 3, 33720 Tampere, Finland.
Tampere University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) provides a means to analyse and model three-dimensional (3D) tissue engineering scaffolds. This study proposes a set of micro-CT-based tools firstly for evaluating the microstructure of scaffolds and secondly for comparing different cell seeding methods. The pore size, porosity and pore interconnectivity of supercritical CO

Indexed as

Tissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsCell Culture TechniquesHumansPolyestersPorosityX-Ray MicrotomographyPolyesterscell seedingmicro-CTmicrospheresupercritical CO2 processingtissue engineeringUSPIO

Identifiers

PMID32228403
PMCPMC7211473
OpenAlexW3013212701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.