Trial reportCirculation2020
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction: Insights From the SHaRe Registry.
Trial report in Circulation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
102 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 204 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between programmed electrical stimulation inducibility and arrhythmic risk in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2025Pooled it
- Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy - 2024.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2024Guideline
- Complication management in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Imaging-Based Risk Stratification for Sudden Cardiac Death in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Current Evidence and Clinical Perspectives.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Sex Differences in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Integrating Genotyping and Left Atrial Strain Analysis Enhances Risk Stratification in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Perspectives on phenotype in genetic testing for early-onset atrial fibrillation.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Personalized Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Stratification in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Beyond Conventional Risk Scores.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- 2026 Expert Consensus Recommendations on Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Report of the Task Force of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2026Article
- "Burned-Out" Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Overlap on Cardiac MRI With Other Nonischemic Cardiomyopathies.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Atrial Fibrillation: Prevalence and Risk Factors.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Integrated Use of Late Gadolinium Enhancement and Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.JACC. Asia · 2026Article
- Multimodality imaging in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Review
- Heart Failure in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Cardiac failure review · 2026Review
- Warning indicators for heart transplantation requirement at the time of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy diagnosis.Cardiology journal · 2026Article
- Diagnostic and prognostic value of myocardial work indices in evaluating cardiac function damage in active acromegaly patients.Endocrine connections · 2026Article
- Genetic Spectrum, Clinical Characteristics, and Molecular Pathogenesis of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Requiring Heart Transplantation.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
- The impact of metformin on myocardial hypertrophy: an updated systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Review
- Relationships between QRS duration and left ventricular deformation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Development, Validation, and Subtype Analysis of a Predictive Model for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 13 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe term "end stage" has been used to describe hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD), defined as occurring when left ventricular ejection fraction is <50%. The prognosis of HCM-LVSD has reportedly been poor, but because of its relative rarity, the natural history remains incompletely characterized.
methodsData from 11 high-volume HCM specialty centers making up the international SHaRe Registry (Sarcomeric Human Cardiomyopathy Registry) were used to describe the natural history of patients with HCM-LVSD. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify predictors of prognosis and incident development.
resultsFrom a cohort of 6793 patients with HCM, 553 (8%) met the criteria for HCM-LVSD. Overall, 75% of patients with HCM-LVSD experienced clinically relevant events, and 35% met the composite outcome (all-cause death [n=128], cardiac transplantation [n=55], or left ventricular assist device implantation [n=9]). After recognition of HCM-LVSD, the median time to composite outcome was 8.4 years. However, there was substantial individual variation in natural history. Significant predictors of the composite outcome included the presence of multiple pathogenic/likely pathogenic sarcomeric variants (hazard ratio [HR], 5.6 [95% CI, 2.3-13.5]), atrial fibrillation (HR, 2.6 [95% CI, 1.7-3.5]), and left ventricular ejection fraction <35% (HR, 2.0 [95% CI, 1.3-2.8]). The incidence of new HCM-LVSD was ≈7.5% over 15 years. Significant predictors of developing incident HCM-LVSD included greater left ventricular cavity size (HR, 1.1 [95% CI, 1.0-1.3] and wall thickness (HR, 1.3 [95% CI, 1.1-1.4]), left ventricular ejection fraction of 50% to 60% (HR, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.2, 2.8]-2.8 [95% CI, 1.8-4.2]) at baseline evaluation, the presence of late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (HR, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.0-4.9]), and the presence of a pathogenic/likely pathogenic sarcomeric variant, particularly in thin filament genes (HR, 1.5 [95% CI, 1.0-2.1] and 2.5 [95% CI, 1.2-5.1], respectively).
conclusionsHCM-LVSD affects ≈8% of patients with HCM. Although the natural history of HCM-LVSD was variable, 75% of patients experienced adverse events, including 35% experiencing a death equivalent an estimated median time of 8.4 years after developing systolic dysfunction. In addition to clinical features, genetic substrate appears to play a role in both prognosis (multiple sarcomeric variants) and the risk for incident development of HCM-LVSD (thin filament variants).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.