Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32228019›Full record

ArticlePhysiological research2020

In Vivo Documentation of Stimulus Velocity Tuning of Mechanically Induced Reflex Cough.

B Demoulin, L Coutier-Marie, I Ioan, C E Schweitzer, L Foucauld, S Demoulin-Alexikova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Evaluation methods and influencing factors of cough sensitivity.Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

B DemoulinResearch Unit EA 3450 DevAH-Development, Adaptation and Handicap, Campus Biologie Santé, University of Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France.silvia.demoulin-alexikova@univ-lorraine.fr.
L Coutier-Marie
I Ioan
C E Schweitzer
L Foucauld
S Demoulin-Alexikova

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to clear airways and lungs defensive reflexes are provoked rather by the dynamic phase of mechanical stimulus. It is speculated that provocation of defensive response depends not only on stimulus duration but also on stimulus velocity. Fourteen adult rabbits were anaesthetized and tracheotomized. Mechanical stimulus was provoked by a mechanical probe introduced through the tracheotomy and rotated by a small electrical motor using a rotational velocity of 40 rpm/s and 20 rpm/s. Threshold, incidence and intensity of cough reflex (CR) were analyzed for each animal. Statistical comparisons between two velocities were performed using Friedman nonparametric test for repeated measurements. Results are median (25-75 %). The threshold of CR was significantly increased (p=0.005) from 350 ms (300-500 ms) to 550 ms (350-1150 ms) and the incidence of cough reflex was significantly reduced (p=0.002) from 50 % (19 50 %) to 0 % (0-25 %) when the rotational velocity of the mechanical probe was reduced by half. The findings of this study are of interest as they show that protective reflex cough, an important mechanism that allows clearing airways even during sleep or anesthesia, is tuned by mechanical stimulus velocity.

Indexed as

AnimalsCoughLungPhysical StimulationRabbitsReflexTidal VolumeTrachea

Identifiers

PMID32228019
PMCPMC8604052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.