Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32227958›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2020

Optimization of Synovial Fluid Collection and Processing for NMR Metabolomics and LC-MS/MS Proteomics.

James R Anderson, Marie M Phelan, Luis M Rubio-Martinez, Matthew M Fitzgerald, Simon W Jones, Peter D Clegg, Mandy J Peffers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Quantitative NMR Methods in Metabolomics.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

James R AndersonInstitute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, U.K.ORCID 0000-0003-0489-7997
Marie M PhelanInstitute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, U.K.
Luis M Rubio-MartinezInstitute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, U.K.
Matthew M FitzgeraldInstitute of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston CH64 7TE, U.K.
Simon W JonesInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, U.K.
Peter D CleggInstitute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, U.K.
Mandy J PeffersInstitute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-6979-0440

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M009114/1Medical Research Council MR/P020941/1Medical Research Council MR/P021220/1Wellcome Trust 107471/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synovial fluid (SF) is of great interest for the investigation of orthopedic pathologies, as it is in close proximity to various tissues that are primarily altered during these disease processes and can be collected using minimally invasive protocols. Multi-"omic" approaches are commonplace, although little consideration is often given for multiple analysis techniques at sample collection. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) metabolomics and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) proteomics are two complementary techniques particularly suited to the study of SF. However, currently there are no agreed upon standard protocols that are published for SF collection and processing for use with NMR metabolomic analysis. Furthermore, the large protein concentration dynamic range present within SF can mask the detection of lower abundance proteins in proteomics. While combinational ligand libraries (ProteoMiner columns) have been developed to reduce this dynamic range, their reproducibility when used in conjunction with SF, or on-bead protein digestion protocols, has yet to be investigated. Here we employ optimized protocols for the collection, processing, and storage of SF for NMR metabolite analysis and LC-MS/MS proteome analysis, including a Lys-C endopeptidase digestion step prior to tryptic digestion, which increased the number of protein identifications and improved reproducibility for on-bead ProteoMiner digestion.

Indexed as

ProteomicsTandem Mass SpectrometryChromatography, LiquidMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMetabolomicsReproducibility of ResultsSynovial FluidLys-C endopeptidasemass spectrometrymetabolomicsnuclear magnetic resonanceproteomicssynovial fluid

Identifiers

PMID32227958
PMCPMC7341532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.