Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32227458›Full record

SynthesisOrthopaedic surgery2020

Visceral Metastasis: A Prognostic Factor of Survival in Patients with Spinal Metastases.

Deng-Xing Lun, Nai-Wang Chen, Jiang-Tao Feng, Xion-Gang Yang, Zhao-Wan Xu, Feng Li, Yong-Cheng Hu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Orthopaedic surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A novel inflammatory-nutritional nomogram for predicting survival after minimally invasive surgery for spinal metastases: a comparison with the Katagiri and SORG systems.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Features of Spinal Metastases: A Retrospective View.International journal of spine surgery · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Deng-Xing LunDepartment of Spine Surgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0641-4517
Nai-Wang ChenDepartment of Spine Surgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, China.
Jiang-Tao FengGraduate School of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Xion-Gang YangGraduate School of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Zhao-Wan XuDepartment of Spine Surgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, China.
Feng LiDepartment of Spine Surgery, Weifang People's Hospital, Weifang, China.
Yong-Cheng HuDepartment of Bone Oncology, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Weifang People's Hospital · CNTianjin Medical University · CNTianjin Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo characterize the visceral metastasis as a predictive tool for the survival of patients with spinal metastases through an exploratory meta-analysis.

methodsTwo investigators independently searched PubMed and Embase databases for eligible studies from 2000-2016. The effect estimates for the hazard ratio (HR) or risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were collected and pooled with a random- or fixed-effect model.

resultsIn total, 18 eligible studies were retrieved with 5468 participants from nine countries. The overall pooled effect size for HR and RR was 1.50 and 3.79, respectively, which was proved to be statistically significant. In the subgroup of prostate cancer (PCa) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), statistical significance and marginal statistical significance was presented for the pooled HR (HR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.35-2.29) and (RR = 1.56, 95% CI 0.99-2.48), respectively. However, in the subgroup of thyroid cancer, breast cancer, and renal cancer, statistical significance was not achieved (HR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.75-1.83, Z = 0.70, P = 0.486). The results did not show any evidence of publication bias.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated that visceral metastasis was a significant prognostic factor in patients with spinal metastases as a whole. Interestingly, the onset of visceral metastases differentially impacted the survival in different primary tumors. Therefore, the prognostic value of visceral metastasis might be related to the type of primary tumor.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSpinal NeoplasmsSurvival AnalysisVisceraMeta-analysisMetastatic spinal cord compressionPrognosisSurvivalVisceral metastasis

Identifiers

PMID32227458
PMCPMC7189062
OpenAlexW3013393826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.