Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32227394›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2020

Transport of N and P in U.S. streams and rivers differs with land use and between dissolved and particulate forms.

David W P Manning, Amy D Rosemond, Jonathan P Benstead, Phillip M Bumpers, John S Kominoski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Lake chlorophyll-a linked to upstream nutrients across the CONUS.Environmental science & technology letters · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Sustained stoichiometric imbalance and its ecological consequences in a large oligotrophic lake.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Transport of N and P in U.S. streams and rivers differs with land use and between dissolved and particulate forms.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

David W P ManningOdum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1968-0707
Amy D RosemondOdum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4299-9353
Jonathan P BensteadDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 35487, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2845-1140
Phillip M BumpersOdum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, 30602, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1298-0571
John S KominoskiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, 33199, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0978-3326

Funding

Division of Environmental Biology DEB-0918894Division of Environmental Biology DEB-0918904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We used a recently published, open-access data set of U.S. streamwater nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations to test whether watershed land use differentially influences N and P concentrations, including the relative availability of dissolved and particulate nutrient fractions. We tested the hypothesis that N and P concentrations and molar ratios in streams and rivers of the United States reflect differing nutrient inputs from three dominant land-use types (agricultural, urban and forested). We also tested for differences between dissolved inorganic nutrients and suspended particulate nutrient fractions to infer sources and potential processing mechanisms across spatial and temporal scales. Observed total N and P concentrations often exceeded reported thresholds for structural changes to benthic algae (58, 57% of reported values, respectively), macroinvertebrates (39% for TN and TP), and fish (41, 37%, respectively). The majority of dissolved N and P concentrations exceeded threshold concentrations known to stimulate benthic algal growth (85, 87%, respectively), and organic matter breakdown rates (94, 58%, respectively). Concentrations of both N and P, and total and dissolved N:P ratios, were higher in streams and rivers with more agricultural and urban than forested land cover. The pattern of elevated nutrient concentrations with agricultural and urban land use was weaker for particulate fractions. The % N contained in particles decreased slightly with higher agriculture and urbanization, whereas % P in particles was unrelated to land use. Particulate N:P was relatively constant (interquartile range = 2-7) and independent of variation in DIN:DIP (interquartile range = 22-152). Dissolved, but not particulate, N:P ratios were temporally variable. Constant particulate N:P across steep DIN:DIP gradients in both space and time suggests that the stoichiometry of particulates across U.S. watersheds is most likely controlled either by external or by physicochemical instream factors, rather than by biological processing within streams. Our findings suggest that most U.S. streams and rivers have concentrations of N and P exceeding those considered protective of ecological integrity, retain dissolved N less efficiently than P, which is retained proportionally more in particles, and thus transport and export high N:P streamwater to downstream ecosystems on a continental scale.

Indexed as

EcosystemRiversAgricultureAnimalsNitrogenPhosphorusUnited StatesNitrogenPhosphoruscontinental scaleecological stoichiometryfreshwaterNAWQAnutrient enrichmentwatershed

Identifiers

PMID32227394
PMCPMC7507146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.