Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32227366›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2020

Interplay between components of pupil-linked phasic arousal and its role in driving behavioral choice in Go/No-Go perceptual decision-making.

Brian J Schriver, Sean M Perkins, Paul Sajda, Qi Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Contribution of the Locus Ceruleus-Norepinephrine System to the Coupling between Pupil-Linked Arousal and Cortical State.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Optogenetic Locus Coeruleus Stimulation Improves Pupil Size Tracking of Cortical State.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brian J SchriverDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7224-9890
Sean M PerkinsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9456-4648
Paul SajdaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9738-1342
Qi WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8656-1439

Funding

ADVANCED GRADUATE TRAINING PROGRAM IN THEORETICAL NEUROSCIENCET32NS064929 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Laurence F. Abbott, Roudabeh Behnia · 2009 to 2026
$2.9M
The role of the locus coeruleus in mediating pupil-linked arousalR01MH112267 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI WANG, QI · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
NIH HHS R01MH112267NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112267NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS064929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In decision-making tasks, neural circuits involved in different aspects of information processing may activate the central arousal system, likely through their interconnection with brainstem arousal nuclei, collectively contributing to the observed pupil-linked phasic arousal. However, the individual components of the phasic arousal associated with different elements of information processing and their effects on behavior remain little known. In this study, we used machine learning techniques to decompose pupil-linked phasic arousal evoked by different components of information processing in rats performing a Go/No-Go perceptual decision-making task. We found that phasic arousal evoked by stimulus encoding was larger for the Go stimulus than the No-Go stimulus. For each session, the separation between distributions of phasic arousal evoked by the Go and by the No-Go stimulus was predictive of perceptual performance. The separation between distributions of decision-formation-evoked arousal on correct and incorrect trials was correlated with decision criterion but not perceptual performance. When a Go stimulus was presented, the action of go was primarily determined by the phasic arousal evoked by stimulus encoding. On the contrary, when a No-Go stimulus was presented, the action of go was determined by phasic arousal elicited by both stimulus encoding and decision formation. Drift diffusion modeling revealed that the four model parameters were better accounted for when phasic arousal elicited by both stimulus encoding and decision formation was considered. These results suggest that the interplay between phasic arousal evoked by both stimulus encoding and decision formation has important functional consequences on forming behavioral choice in perceptual decision-making.

Indexed as

AnimalsArousalBehavior, AnimalDecision MakingFemaleMachine LearningPsychomotor PerformancePupilRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyVibrissaedecision-makingGo/No-Go discrimination taskhierarchical drift-diffusion modelpupil-linked arousalpupillometryvibrissae

Identifiers

PMID32227366
PMCPMC7657665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.