ReviewEpilepsia2020
How technology is driving the landscape of epilepsy surgery.
Review in Epilepsia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- A 2-Year Experience of Robot-Assisted Epilepsy Surgery Using a New Cranial Robotic System With Optical Tracking: Variables Influencing Accuracy and Complications.Neurosurgery practice · 2026Article
- Article
- Immediate to longer-term neurophysiological impact of acute neural network disruption.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Robotic Surgery in Pediatric Epilepsy : Current Evidence, Clinical Impact, and Future Directions.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Article
- Epileptogenesis and Epilepsy Treatment: Advances in Mechanistic Understanding, Therapeutic Approaches, and Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Intranasal Biodegradable Nanomedicine for Epilepsy Management: Targeting the Brain Beyond the Blood-Brain Barrier.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Epilepsy surgery: From bench to the clinics.Epilepsia open · 2025Article
- Models of human hippocampal specialization: a look at the electrophysiological evidence.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025Review
- Advancements in Surgical Therapies for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Paradigm Shift towards Precision Care.Neurology and therapy · 2025Review
- A Comprehensive Review of Recent Trends in Surgical Approaches for Epilepsy Management.Cureus · 2024Review
- Current state of the art of traditional and minimal invasive epilepsy surgery approaches.Brain & spine · 2024Review
- From bench to bedside: Overview of magnetoencephalography in basic principle, signal processing, source localization and clinical applications.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2024Review
- The return of the lesion for localization and therapy.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2023Article
- Clinical infections in neurosurgical oncology: An overview.World journal of clinical cases · 2023Review
- Article
- Neurosurgical Approaches to Brain Tissue Harvesting for the Establishment of Cell Cultures in Neural Experimental Cell Models.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- The Modular Concept in Skull Base Surgery: Anatomical Basis of the Median, Paramedian and Lateral Corridors.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2021Article
- Covid, AI, and Robotics-A Neurologist's Perspective.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021Article
- Epileptogenic Zone Location of Temporal Lobe Epilepsy by Cross-Frequency Coupling Analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- How technology is driving the landscape of epilepsy surgery.Epilepsia · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article emphasizes the role of the technological progress in changing the landscape of epilepsy surgery and provides a critical appraisal of robotic applications, laser interstitial thermal therapy, intraoperative imaging, wireless recording, new neuromodulation techniques, and high-intensity focused ultrasound. Specifically, (a) it relativizes the current hype in using robots for stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) to increase the accuracy of depth electrode placement and save operating time; (b) discusses the drawback of laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) when it comes to the need for adequate histopathologic specimen and the fact that the concept of stereotactic disconnection is not new; (c) addresses the ratio between the benefits and expenditure of using intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), that is, the high technical and personnel expertise needed that might restrict its use to centers with a high case load, including those unrelated to epilepsy; (d) soberly reviews the advantages, disadvantages, and future potentials of neuromodulation techniques with special emphasis on the differences between closed and open-loop systems; and (e) provides a critical outlook on the clinical implications of focused ultrasound, wireless recording, and multipurpose electrodes that are already on the horizon. This outlook shows that although current ultrasonic systems do have some limitations in delivering the acoustic energy, further advance of this technique may lead to novel treatment paradigms. Furthermore, it highlights that new data streams from multipurpose electrodes and wireless transmission of intracranial recordings will become available soon once some critical developments will be achieved such as electrode fidelity, data processing and storage, heat conduction as well as rechargeable technology. A better understanding of modern epilepsy surgery will help to demystify epilepsy surgery for the patients and the treating physicians and thereby reduce the surgical treatment gap.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.