Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32227266›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2020

Radiomics of cholangiocarcinoma on pretreatment CT can identify patients who would best respond to radioembolisation.

Cristina Mosconi, Alessandro Cucchetti, Antonio Bruno, Alberta Cappelli, Irene Bargellini, Caterina De Benedittis, Giulia Lorenzoni, Annagiulia Gramenzi, Francesco Paolo Tarantino, Lorenza Parini and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Japanese journal of radiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cristina MosconiRadiology Unit, Department of Specialized, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine - DIMES, S.Orsola - Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Alessandro CucchettiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences - DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. aleqko@libero.it.
Antonio BrunoRadiology Unit, Department of Specialized, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine - DIMES, S.Orsola - Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Alberta CappelliRadiology Unit, Department of Specialized, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine - DIMES, S.Orsola - Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Irene BargelliniInterventional Radiology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
Caterina De BenedittisRadiology Unit, Department of Specialized, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine - DIMES, S.Orsola - Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giulia LorenzoniInterventional Radiology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
Annagiulia GramenziDivision of Semeiotic, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences- DIMEC; S.Orsola - Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Francesco Paolo TarantinoInterventional Radiology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
Lorenza PariniRadiology Unit, Department of Specialized, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine - DIMES, S.Orsola - Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Vincenzina PettinatoMedical Physics Unit, Radiology Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Francesco ModestinoRadiology Unit, Department of Specialized, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine - DIMES, S.Orsola - Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giuliano PetaRadiology Unit, Department of Specialized, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine - DIMES, S.Orsola - Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Roberto CioniInterventional Radiology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
Rita GolfieriRadiology Unit, Department of Specialized, Diagnostic and Experimental Medicine - DIMES, S.Orsola - Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
University of Bologna · ITPoliclinico S.Orsola-Malpighi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesResults after trans-arterial radioembolisation (TARE) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCC) depend on the architecture of the tumour. This latter can be quantified through computed tomography (CT) texture analysis. The aims of the present study were to analyse relationships between CT textural features prior to TARE and objective response (OR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

methodsTexture analysis was retrospectively applied to 55 pre-TARE CT scans of iCCs, focusing attention on the histogram-based features and the grey-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM). Texture features were harmonised using the ComBat procedure. Objective response was assessed using the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours 1.1. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method was applied to select the most useful textural features related to OR.

resultsOf the 55 patients, 53 had post-TARE imaging available, showing OR in 56.6% of cases. Texture analysis showed that iCCs showing OR after TARE had a higher uptake of iodine contrast in the arterial phase (higher mean histogram values, p < 0.001) and more homogeneous distribution (lower kurtosis, p = 0.043; GLCM contrast, p = 0.004; GLCM dissimilarity, p = 0.005, and higher GLCM homogeneity, p = 0.005; and GLCM correlation p = 0.030) at the pre-TARE CT scan. A favourable radiomic signature was calculated and observed in 15 of the 55 patients. The median PFS of these 15 patients was 12.1 months and that of the remaining 40 patients was 5.1 months (p = 0.008).

conclusionsTexture analysis of pre-TARE CT scans can quantify vascularisation and homogeneity of iCC architecture, providing clinical information useful in identifying ideal TARE candidates. KEY POINTS: • Hypervascular tumours with a more homogeneous uptake of iodine contrast in the arterial phase were those most likely to be effectively treated by TARE. • The arterial phase was observed to be the best acquisition phase for providing information regarding the "sensitivity" of the tumour to TARE. • Patients with favourable radiomic signature showed a median progression-free survival of 12.1 months versus 5.1 months of patients with an unfavourable signature (p = 0.008).

Indexed as

BrachytherapyAgedBile Duct NeoplasmsBile Ducts, IntrahepaticCholangiocarcinomaContrast MediaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedContrast MediaCancerCholangiocarcinomaRadiologySurvival

Identifiers

PMID32227266
OpenAlexW3013605866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.