ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2020
Vitamin and herbal supplements' use among patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancers included in eight clinical trials.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The role of plant-derived natural substances as immunomodulatory agents in carcinogenesis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the patterns of vitamin and herbal supplement use among patients with advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancers and the association of such behavior with the efficacy and toxicity of systemic anticancer treatment.
methodsProject data sphere (PDS) was used to access de-identified datasets of eight clinical trials of advanced GI cancers. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors predicting the use of supplements. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates were used to evaluate the association of supplement use with overall and progression-free survival. Results were stratified according to the site of the primary tumor [pancreatic, gastric, colorectal or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)] The association between supplement use and selected chemotherapy side effects was evaluated through Chi-squared testing and subsequent logistic regression.
resultsA total of 3441 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 775 patients reported use of supplements and 2666 patients reported no use of supplements. Higher ECOG performance score (Odds ratio: OR for ECOG 1 versus 0: 1.629; 95% CI 1.363-1.947; P < 0.001) and pancreatic primary site (OR for gastric cancer versus pancreatic cancer: 0.538; 95% CI 0.408-0.709; P < 0.001) was associated with greater use of these supplements. Supplement use was associated with a better overall survival among patients with pancreatic cancer (P = 0.002) but not other GI malignancies. Supplement use was associated with a higher probability of anemia and diarrhea among patients with pancreatic cancer (P < 0.001 for both), gastric cancer (P = 0.016; P = 0.036, respectively) and colorectal cancer (P < 0.001 for both).
conclusionsThere is an association between the use of vitamin and herbal supplements and a higher probability of hematologic and gastrointestinal toxicities. There is a need for more studies to confirm the association between such behavior and better overall survival among patients with pancreatic cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.