Trial reportJAMA cardiology2020
Association of Sex With Severity of Coronary Artery Disease, Ischemia, and Symptom Burden in Patients With Moderate or Severe Ischemia: Secondary Analysis of the ISCHEMIA Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01471522 (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches), which is not on this map. Cited by 77 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA)
Who cites it
77 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 152 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex differences in saphenous vein graft patency: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of cardiac surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Sex differences in coronary disease health Status outcomes: the ISCHEMIA trial.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2026Trial
- Trajectories of Angina After Initial Invasive vs Conservative Strategy for Chronic Coronary Disease.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2025Trial
- Sex Differences in Psychosocial Factors and Angina in Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Trial
- Relationship Between Severity of Ischemia and Coronary Artery Disease for Different Stress Test Modalities in the ISCHEMIA Trial.Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions · 2024Trial
- Outcomes by sex in the International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024Trial
- Sex Differences in Revascularization, Treatment Goals, and Outcomes of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: Insights From the ISCHEMIA Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Trial
- Ischemia With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries: Insights From the ISCHEMIA Trial.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2023Trial
- Comparative effectiveness of initial computed tomography and invasive coronary angiography in women and men with stable chest pain and suspected coronary artery disease: multicentre randomised trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2022Trial
- Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention: a substudy of the ORBITA trial.European heart journal · 2022Trial
- Comparison of risk profiles of participants in the Women's IschemiA TRial to Reduce events In non-ObstRuctive CAD (WARRIOR) trial, using Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography vs Invasive Coronary Angiography.Progress in cardiovascular diseasesTrial
- Sex-specific differences in the anatomical localization and severity of coronary artery disease: differential impact of conventional cardiovascular risk factors.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Population-level trends in non-invasive cardiac imaging before coronary revascularization.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Role of a Heart Center for Women in the Prevention and Diagnosis of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Women.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-enabled plaque characterization from coronary computed tomography establishes basis of angina in women with nonobstructive atherosclerosis.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Acute coronary syndromes across the lifespan of women.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2026Review
- Sex-specific differences in coronary blood flow dynamics during coronary artery bypass surgery.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Sex differences in coronary artery disease.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Changing clinical perspectives on sex and healthcare disparities in ischaemic heart disease.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Review
- Sex differences in health status trajectories among Chinese angina patients: a post-hoc analysis of the GREAT multicenter prospective cohort.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
32 authors at 20 institutions in 10 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: While many features of stable ischemic heart disease vary by sex, differences in ischemia, coronary anatomy, and symptoms by sex have not been investigated among patients with moderate or severe ischemia. The enrolled ISCHEMIA trial cohort that underwent coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) was required to have obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) for randomization. Objective: To describe sex differences in stress testing, CCTA findings, and symptoms in ISCHEMIA trial participants. Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of the multicenter ISCHEMIA randomized clinical trial analyzed baseline characteristics of patients with stable ischemic heart disease. Individuals were enrolled from July 2012 to January 2018 based on local reading of moderate or severe ischemia on a stress test, after which blinded CCTA was performed in most. Core laboratories reviewed stress tests and CCTAs. Participants with no obstructive CAD or with left main CAD of 50% or greater were excluded. Those who met eligibility criteria including CCTA (if performed) were randomized to a routine invasive or a conservative management strategy (N = 5179). Angina was assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. Analysis began October 1, 2018. Interventions: CCTA and angina assessment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sex differences in stress test, CCTA findings, and symptom severity. Results: Of 8518 patients enrolled, 6256 (77%) were men. Women were more likely to have no obstructive CAD (<50% stenosis in all vessels on CCTA) (353 of 1022 [34.4%] vs 378 of 3353 [11.3%]). Of individuals who were randomized, women had more angina at baseline than men (median [interquartile range] Seattle Angina Questionnaire Angina Frequency score: 80 [70-100] vs 90 [70-100]). Women had less severe ischemia on stress imaging (383 of 919 [41.7%] vs 1361 of 2972 [45.9%] with severe ischemia; 386 of 919 [42.0%] vs 1215 of 2972 [40.9%] with moderate ischemia; and 150 of 919 [16.4%] vs 394 of 2972 [13.3%] with mild or no ischemia). Ischemia was similar by sex on exercise tolerance testing. Women had less extensive CAD on CCTA (205 of 568 women [36%] vs 1142 of 2418 men [47%] with 3-vessel disease; 184 of 568 women [32%] vs 754 of 2418 men [31%] with 2-vessel disease; and 178 of 568 women [31%] vs 519 of 2418 men [22%] with 1-vessel disease). Female sex was independently associated with greater angina frequency (odds ratio, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.13-1.76). Conclusions and Relevance: Women in the ISCHEMIA trial had more frequent angina, independent of less extensive CAD, and less severe ischemia than men. These findings reflect inherent sex differences in the complex relationships between angina, atherosclerosis, and ischemia that may have implications for testing and treatment of patients with suspected stable ischemic heart disease. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01471522.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.