Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32227060›Full record

ReviewJournal of materials chemistry. B2020

Modular microcarrier technologies for cell-based bone regeneration.

Chukwuma E Nweke, Jan P Stegemann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of materials chemistry. B, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Fabrication and characterization of osteogenic function of progenitor cell-laden gelatin microcarriers.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chukwuma E NwekeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Biomedical Engineering Building, University of Michigan, 1101 Beal Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. jpsteg@umich.edu and Macromolecular Science & Engineering Program, North Campus Research Complex, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Jan P StegemannDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Biomedical Engineering Building, University of Michigan, 1101 Beal Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. jpsteg@umich.edu and Macromolecular Science & Engineering Program, North Campus Research Complex, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6986-5067

Funding

Tissue Engineering and RegenerationT32DE007057 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DAVID H. KOHN · 1985 to 2026
$17.3M
Microscale Mechanobiology for Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering using Advanced Ultrasound TechniquesR01DE026630 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI DENG, CHERI X, STEGEMANN, JAN P. · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
Bone Regeneration Using Osteogenic and Vasculogenic Tissue ModulesR01AR062636 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI STEGEMANN, JAN P. · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR062636NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE026630NIDCR NIH HHS T32 DE007057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variety of materials-based approaches to accelerate the regeneration of damaged bone have been developed to meet the important clinical need for improved bone fillers. This comprehensive review covers the materials and technologies used in modular microcarrier-based methods for delivery of progenitor cells in orthopaedic repair applications. It provides an overview of the field and the rationale for using microcarriers combined with osteoprogenitor cells for bone regeneration in particular. The general concepts and methods used in microcarrier-based cell culture and delivery are described, and methods for fabricating and characterizing microcarriers designed for specific indications are presented. A comprehensive review of the current literature on the use of microcarriers in bone regeneration is provided, with emphasis on key developments in the field and their impact. The studies reviewed are organized according to the broad classes of materials that are used for fabricating microcarriers, including polysaccharides, proteins and peptides, ceramics, and synthetic polymers. In addition, composite microcarriers that incorporate multiple material types or that are mineralized biomimetically are included. In each case, the fabrication, processing, characterization, and resulting function of the microcarriers is described, with an emphasis on their ability to support osteogenic differentiation of progenitor cells in vitro, and their effectiveness in healing bone defects in vivo. In addition, a summary of the current state of the field is provided, as are future perspectives on how microcarrier technologies may be enhanced to create improved cell-based therapies for bone regeneration.

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationAnimalsCell DifferentiationCeramicsHumansPeptidesPolymersPolysaccharidesProteinsRegenerative MedicineStem CellsPeptidesPolymersPolysaccharidesProteins

Identifiers

PMID32227060
PMCPMC7228840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.