Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32226883›Full record

ArticleACS omega2020

Physicochemical and Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Anacardic Acid Derivatives.

Fahmina Zafar, Anjali Gupta, Karthick Thangavel, Kavita Khatana, Ali Alhaji Sani, Anujit Ghosal, Poonam Tandon, Nahid Nishat

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Synergistic Polyphenol Recovery FromJournal of analytical methods in chemistry · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. ACS omega · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Journal of tropical medicine · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Fahmina ZafarInorganic Materials Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India.
Anjali GuptaDivision of Chemistry, School of Basic and Applied Science, Galgotias University, Greater Noida 201310, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Karthick ThangavelDepartment of Physics, School of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur 613 401, Tamil Nadu, India.
Kavita KhatanaDivision of Chemistry, School of Basic and Applied Science, Galgotias University, Greater Noida 201310, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ali Alhaji SaniDivision of Chemistry, School of Basic and Applied Science, Galgotias University, Greater Noida 201310, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Anujit GhosalInorganic Materials Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India.
Poonam TandonDepartment of Physics, University of Lucknow, Lucknow 226007, India.
Nahid NishatInorganic Materials Research Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India.
Galgotias University · INJamia Millia Islamia · INBeijing Institute of Technology · CNSASTRA University · INUniversity of Lucknow · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anacardic acid (AA) and its derivatives are well-known for their therapeutic applications ranging from antitumor, antibacterial, antioxidant, anticancer, and so forth. However, their poor pharmacokinetic and safety properties create significant hurdles in the formulation of the final drug molecule. As a part of our endeavor to enhance the potential and exploration of the anticancer activities, a detailed study on the properties of selected AA derivatives was performed in this work. A comprehensive analysis of the drug-like properties of 100 naturally occurring AA derivatives was performed, and the results were compared with certain marketed anticancer drugs. The work focused on the understanding of the interplay among eight physicochemical properties. The relationships between the physicochemical properties, absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion attributes, and the in silico toxicity profile for the set of AA derivatives were established. The ligand efficacy of the finally scrutinized 17 AA derivatives on the basis of pharmacokinetic properties and toxicity parameters was further subjected to dock against the potential anticancer target cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (PDB ID: 1W98). In the docked complex, the ligand molecules (AA derivatives) selectively bind with the target residues, and a high binding affinity of the ligand molecules was ensured by the full fitness score using the SwissDock Web server. The BOILED-Egg model shows that out of 17 scrutinized molecules, 3 molecules exhibit gastrointestinal absorption capability and 14 molecules exhibit permeability through the blood-brain barrier penetration. The analysis can also provide some useful insights to chemists to modify the existing natural scaffolds in designing new anacardic anticancer drugs. The increased probability of success may lead to the identification of drug-like candidates with favorable safety profiles after further clinical evaluation.

Identifiers

PMID32226883
PMCPMC7098041
OpenAlexW3012401935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.