ArticleACS omega2020
Shape Effect of the Riser Cross Section on the Full-Loop Hydrodynamics of a Three-Dimensional Circulating Fluidized Bed.
Article in ACS omega, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, numerical simulation is carried out in a three-dimensional full-loop pilot-scale circulating fluidized bed to explore the shape effect of the riser cross section on the typical flow characteristics of the bed via the multiphase particle-in-cell (MP-PIC) method. The gas and solid phases are modeled with the large eddy simulation and Newton's law of motion in the Eulerian and Lagrangian frameworks, respectively. The proposed model has been well validated with experimental data, followed by evaluating the typical core-annulus structure and the nonuniformity of the solid phase distributed along the radial and axial directions of the riser. Then, the particle-scale information of the solid phase distributed in different parts of the system is explored. The results demonstrate that (i) the square riser gives rise to a higher solid inventory in the standpipe owing to the stronger circulation intensity; (ii) the thickness of the solid back-mixing layer reduces along the riser height; the solid back-mixing tends to concentrate in the four corners, while it is not obvious near the sidewalls of the square riser; and (iii) nonuniform distribution of the particle-scale information of the solid phase (e.g., mass, flux, drag force, and slip velocity) can be observed. The square riser gives rise to comparatively more uniform axial mass distribution, a larger rising solid flux, larger horizontal transportation velocity between the core and annulus regions, and a larger horizontal dispersion coefficient in the riser, as compared with the corresponding ones in the circular riser.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.