Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32226711›Full record

ReviewCurrent epidemiology reports2016

Trends in the Mechanistic and Dynamic Modeling of Infectious Diseases.

Justin Lessler, Andrew S Azman, M Kate Grabowski, Henrik Salje, Isabel Rodriguez-Barraquer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current epidemiology reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Modeling zoonotic and vector-borne viruses.Current opinion in virology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Planning as Inference in Epidemiological Dynamics Models.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Evidence Synthesis for Stochastic Epidemic Models.Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Justin LesslerJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD USA.
Andrew S Azman *Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD USA.
M Kate Grabowski *Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD USA.
Henrik Salje *Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD USA.
Isabel Rodriguez-Barraquer *Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dynamics of infectious disease epidemics are driven by interactions between individuals with differing disease status (e.g., susceptible, infected, immune). Mechanistic models that capture the dynamics of such "dependent happenings" are a fundamental tool of infectious disease epidemiology. Recent methodological advances combined with access to new data sources and computational power have resulted in an explosion in the use of dynamic models in the analysis of emerging and established infectious diseases. Increasing use of models to inform practical public health decision making has challenged the field to develop new methods to exploit available data and appropriately characterize the uncertainty in the results. Here, we discuss recent advances and areas of active research in the mechanistic and dynamic modeling of infectious disease. We highlight how a growing emphasis on data and inference, novel forecasting methods, and increasing access to "big data" are changing the field of infectious disease dynamics. We showcase the application of these methods in phylodynamic research, which combines mechanistic models with rich sources of molecular data to tie genetic data to population-level disease dynamics. As dynamics and mechanistic modeling methods mature and are increasingly tied to principled statistical approaches, the historic separation between the infectious disease dynamics and "traditional" epidemiologic methods is beginning to erode; this presents new opportunities for cross pollination between fields and novel applications.

Indexed as

Dynamic modelsDynamicsInfectious diseaseMechanistic modelsModelingPhylodynamics

Identifiers

PMID32226711
PMCPMC7100697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.