Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32226693›Full record

ReviewCureus2020

A Review of the Theoretical Fascial Models: Biotensegrity, Fascintegrity, and Myofascial Chains.

Bruno Bordoni, Thomas Myers

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06493149 (The Use of Tensegrity Concept in the Massage of Selected Muscles in the Context of Their Contractile and Passive Properties Among Men Aged 19-24), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06493149 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Use of Tensegrity Concept in the Massage of Selected Muscles in the Context of Their Contractile and Passive Properties Among Men Aged 19-24

TypeinterventionalSponsorWroclaw University of Health and Sport SciencesRan2024 to 2025Enrolled54ConditionsHealthyArmsMassage therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Low Back Pain in Cycling. Are There Differences between Road and Mountain Biking?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Science of Tai Chi andJournal of integrative and complementary medicine · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Optimizing genicular nerve chemical ablation.The Korean journal of pain · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bruno BordoniPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Foundation Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, ITA.
Thomas MyersAnatomy, Anatomy Trains International, Walpole, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fascial tissue includes solid and liquid fascia (body fluids such as blood and lymph). The fascia's nomenclature is the subject of debate in the academic world, as it is classified starting from different scientific perspectives. This disagreement is not a brake but is, in reality, the real wealth of research, the multidisciplinarity of thought and knowledge that leads to a deeper understanding of the topic. Another topic of discussion is the fascial model to conceptualize the human body, that is, how the fascial tissue fits into the living. Currently, there are some models: biotensegrity, fascintegrity, and myofascial chains. Biotensegrity is a mechanical model, which takes into consideration the solid fascia; fascintegrity considers the solid and the liquid fascia. Myofascial chains converge attention on the movement and transmission of force in the muscle continuum. The article is a reflection on fascial models and how these are theoretical-scientific visions that need to be further investigated.

Indexed as

biotensegretyfasciafascintegritymyofascialmyofascial chainsosteopathicphysiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID32226693
PMCPMC7096016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.