Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32226649›Full record

ReviewAdvances in wound care2020

Imaging in Chronic Wound Diagnostics.

Shuxin Li, Ali H Mohamedi, Jon Senkowsky, Ashwin Nair, Liping Tang

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in wound care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. [Construction of the burn rehabilitation system].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shuxin LiDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas.
Ali H MohamediDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas.
Jon SenkowskyTexas Health Physician's Group, Arlington, Texas.
Ashwin NairProgenitec, Inc., Arlington, Texas.
Liping TangDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas.
The University of Texas at Arlington · USProgenitec (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Wound HealingDiagnostic ImagingHumansSkinWounds and Injurieschronic wound diagnosticsluminescenceneutrophilspHreactive oxygen specieswound imaging probes

Identifiers

PMID32226649
PMCPMC7099416
OpenAlexW2955245685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.