Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32226345›Full record

ReviewThe Yale journal of biology and medicine2020

Understanding Transcriptional Networks Regulating Initiation of Cutaneous Wound Healing.

Rafik Boudra, Matthew R Ramsey

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Transcription-based comparison ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. [Retrospective analysis of 35 burn patients in different stages of pregnancy].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2022
    Observational
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rafik BoudraBrigham and Women's Hospital Department of Dermatology, Boston, MA.
Matthew R RamseyBrigham and Women's Hospital Department of Dermatology, Boston, MA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The epidermis has an essential function in creating a barrier against the external environment to retain proper fluid balance and block the entry of pathogens. When damage occurs to this barrier, the wound must quickly be sealed to avoid fluid loss, cleared of invading pathogens, and then keratinocytes must re-form an intact barrier. This requires complex integration of temporally and spatially distinct signals to execute orderly closure of the wound, and failure of this process can lead to chronic ulceration. Transcription factors serve as a key integration point for the myriad of information coming from the external environment, allowing for an orderly process of re-epithelialization. Importantly, transcription factors engage with and alter the chromatin structure around key target genes through association with different chromatin-modifying complexes. In this review, we will discuss the current understanding of how transcription is regulated during the initiation of re-epithelialization, and the exciting technological advances that will allow for a more refined mechanistic understanding of the re-epithelialization process.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksSkin UlcerHumansRe-EpithelializationSignal TransductionTranscription FactorsWound HealingTranscription Factorskeratinocytesmigrationre-epithelializationskintranscriptionWound healing

Identifiers

PMID32226345
PMCPMC7087049
OpenAlexW3013866307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.