Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32226323›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in infectious diseases2015

Aerosol-Transmitted Infections-a New Consideration for Public Health and Infection Control Teams.

Julian W Tang, Peter Wilson, Nandini Shetty, Catherine J Noakes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in infectious diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Air Change Rate and SARS-CoV-2 Exposure in Hospitals and Residences: A Meta-Analysis.Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Multi-Scale Airborne Infectious Disease Transmission.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julian W Tang1Clinical Microbiology, Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals Leicester, Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, LE1 5WW UK.
Peter Wilson2Clinical Microbiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
Nandini Shetty2Clinical Microbiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
Catherine J Noakes3Institute for Public Health and Environmental Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the emergence of the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), the 2003 reemergence of avian A/H5N1, the emergence of the 2009 pandemic influenza A/H1N1, the 2012 emergence of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), the 2013 emergence of avian A/H7N9 and the 2014 Ebola virus outbreaks, the potential for the aerosol transmission of infectious agents is now routinely considered in the investigation of any outbreak. Although many organisms have traditionally been considered to be transmitted by only one route (e.g. direct/indirect contact and/or faecal-orally), it is now apparent that the aerosol transmission route is also possible and opportunistic, depending on any potentially aerosol-generating procedures, the severity of illness and the degree and duration of pathogen-shedding in the infected patient, as well as the environment in which these activities are conducted.This article reviews the evidence and characteristics of some of the accepted (tuberculosis, measles, chickenpox, whooping cough) and some of the more opportunistic (influenza,

Indexed as

AerosolAirborneAnthraxBioterrorismBordetella pertussisBotulismChickenpoxClostridium difficileDropletDroplet nucleiInfectionInfection controlInfluenzaMeaslesNorovirusPlagueSARSSmallpoxTransmissionTuberculosisTularaemiaVaricellaViral hemorrhagic feversWhooping cough

Identifiers

PMID32226323
PMCPMC7100085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.