Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32226274›Full record

ArticleClinical immunotherapeutics1996

The Use of Antiallergic and Antiasthmatic Drugs in Viral Infections of the Upper Respiratory Tract.

Nils Åberg

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical immunotherapeutics, 1996. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nils ÅbergDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Göteborg, East Hospital, S-416 85 Göteborg, Sweden.
Göteborgs Stads · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite their frequency, upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) constitute an area with few, if any, effective treatment remedies. Asthma and airway allergies share similar pathogenetic mechanisms to URTIs and it is not surprising, therefore, that agents used to treat allergic disorders have also been studied in URTIs. Their possible effects, limitations and hypothetical modes of action in URTIs are reviewed. In controlled clinical trials of satisfactory scientific standard, symptom reductions in both experimental rhinovirus infections and natural colds have occurred with topical anticholinergics, oral antihistamines and topical chromones. Future treatment alternatives for URTIs may include the intranasal anticholinergic ipratropium bromide, new nonsedating antihistamines and sodium cromoglycate (cromolyn sodium). The latter has a record of safety and an absence of adverse effects that would make it an attractive alternative for this common but not particularly serious condition in otherwise healthy individuals.

Indexed as

Allergy Clin ImmunolIpratropium BromideNedocromilNedocromil SodiumSodium Cromoglycate

Identifiers

PMID32226274
PMCPMC7100695
OpenAlexW2076854524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.