ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of New Zealand2020
The Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study: Oral health findings and their implications.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dental Caries of Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026Pooled it
- Access to oral health care services for children with disabilities: a mixed methods systematic review.BMC oral health · 2024Pooled it
- Socioeconomic inequalities and the economic burden of dental caries: a longitudinal simulation analysis across forty countries.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Gender gap in tooth brushing among Korean adolescents.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Need Assessment to Incorporate Geriatric Oral Health Care Education in New Zealand Nursing Curricula: A Narrative Review Study.International journal of dentistry · 2025Review
- Inequalities in oral health: estimating the longitudinal economic burden of dental caries by deprivation status in six countries.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Identification of Swedish caries active individuals aged 30-90 years using a life course perspective and SKaPa longitudinal national registry data over a 10-year period.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2024Article
- Identification of caries-active individuals in longitudinal data a methodological study using a national registry.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2024Article
- Developing an Australian utility value set for the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale-4D (ECOHIS-4D) using a discrete choice experiment.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023Article
- Childhood caries experience in two Aotearoa New Zealand birth cohorts: implications for research, policy and practice.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Longitudinal research is needed to better understand the natural history of oral conditions and long-term health and social outcomes. Oral health data has been collected periodically in the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study for over 40 years. To date, 70+ peer-review articles on the Study's oral health-related findings have been published, providing insight into the natural history of oral conditions, risk factors, impacts on quality of life, and disparities in oral health. Some of these report new findings, while others build upon the existing body of evidence. This paper provides an overview of these findings and reflects on their public health implications and policy utility in New Zealand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.