Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32226029›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Risk practices for bovine tuberculosis transmission to cattle and livestock farming communities living at wildlife-livestock-human interface in northern KwaZulu Natal, South Africa.

Petronillah Rudo Sichewo, Catiane Vander Kelen, Séverine Thys, Anita Luise Michel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evidence ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  7. Culture-independent detection ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  8. Bovine tuberculosis reactor cattle in Southwest Ethiopia: Risk factors for bovine tuberculosis.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Tuberculosis in wild animals in India.Veterinary research communications · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Unraveling the epidemiology ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Epidemiology ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Petronillah Rudo SichewoDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Bovine Tuberculosis and Brucellosis Research Programme, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-4261-4057
Catiane Vander KelenDepartment of Public Health, Neglected Tropical Diseases Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium.
Séverine ThysDepartment of Virology, Parasitology, and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Belgium.
Anita Luise MichelDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, Bovine Tuberculosis and Brucellosis Research Programme, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pretoria, South Africa.
Ghent University · BEInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BENational Zoological Gardens of South Africa · ZAUniversity of Pretoria · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is a disease of cattle that is transmitted through direct contact with an infected animal or ingestion of contaminated food or water. This study seeks to explore the local knowledge on bTB, obtain information on social and cultural practices regarding risk of bTB transmission to cattle and humans (zoonotic TB) in a traditional livestock farming community with a history of bTB diagnosis in cattle and wildlife. Information was collected using a qualitative approach of Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) targeting household members of livestock farmers that owned bTB tested herds. We conducted fourteen FGDs (150 individuals) across four dip tanks that included the following categories of participants from cattle owning households: head of households, herdsmen, dip tank committee members and women. The qualitative data was managed using NVivo Version 12 Pro software. Social and cultural practices were identified as major risky practices for bTB transmission to people, such as the consumption of undercooked meat, consumption of soured /raw milk and lack of protective measures during slaughtering of cattle. The acceptance of animals into a herd without bTB pre-movement testing following traditional practices (e.g. lobola, 'bride price', the temporary introduction of a bull for 'breeding'), the sharing of grazing and watering points amongst the herds and with wildlife were identified as risky practices for M. bovis infection transmission to cattle. Overall, knowledge of bTB in cattle and modes of transmission to people and livestock was found to be high. However, the community was still involved in risky practices that expose people and cattle to bovine TB. An inter-disciplinary 'One Health' approach that engages the community is recommended, to provide locally relevant interventions that allows the community to keep their traditional practices and socio-economic systems whilst avoiding disease transmission to cattle and people.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeLivestockAdolescentAnimal HusbandryAnimalsCattleDisease Transmission, InfectiousFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInfection ControlMaleSouth AfricaTuberculosisTuberculosis, BovineYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32226029
PMCPMC7145264
OpenAlexW3013640309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.