Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32226017›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Uptake of cancer screenings among a multiethnic refugee population in North Texas, 2014-2018.

Amy Raines Milenkov, Martha Felini, Eva Baker, Rushil Acharya, Elvis Longanga Diese, Sara Onsa, Shane Fernando, Holy Chor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Barriers and Facilitators Influencing Arab Muslim Immigrant and Refugee Women's Breast Cancer Screening: A Narrative Review.Journal of transcultural nursing : official journal of the Transcultural Nursing Society · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amy Raines MilenkovDepartment of Pediatrics & Women's Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8178-0779
Martha FeliniDepartment of Pediatrics & Women's Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, United States of America.
Eva BakerDepartment of Pediatrics & Women's Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, United States of America.
Rushil AcharyaDepartment of Pediatrics & Women's Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1546-7335
Elvis Longanga DieseDepartment of Pediatrics & Women's Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, United States of America.
Sara OnsaDepartment of Pediatrics & Women's Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, United States of America.
Shane FernandoDepartment of Pediatrics & Women's Health, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, United States of America.
Holy ChorTexas College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, United States of America.
University of North Texas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRefugees are less likely than US born populations to receive cancer screenings. Building Bridges is a community health worker prevention program designed to increase refugee's cancer screening uptake. The purpose of this cross sectional analysis was to assess differences in uptake of cervical, breast, liver, and colorectal screens across six cultural groups.

methodsData was abstracted in 2018 for this analysis. Participants were categorized into six cultural groups (Myanmar, Central Africa, Bhutan, Somalia, Arabic Speaking Countries, and Other) to assess differences in sociodemographic measures and screening uptake. Uptake proportions were calculated for each cancer type (cervical, breast, liver, and colon) among eligible participants, by gender and cultural group. Differences in uptake across groups were assessed using stratified analysis and logistic regression. Prevalence odds ratios (POR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each group to assess the association between screening completion and cultural group.

findings874 refugees were asked about cancer screening history. The majority of participants were either 'never had been screened' or 'not up-to-date' for every cancer screening. Among age eligible, 82% had no prior pap exam within the past 3 years, 81% had no prior mammogram within the past year, 69% didn't know their Hepatitis B status and 87% never had a colon cancer screening. Overall, higher uptake of all types of cancer screenings was observed in Myanmar and Bhutanese groups, except colon cancer screening which was higher among Central African Region and Arabic Speaking participants.

conclusionScreening uptake varied by ethnic group and screening type. The program reached an under and never screened population, however, the proportion of refugees who received a cancer screening remained low compared to the US population. Diversity within refugee communities requires adaptation to specific cultural and linguistic needs to include new Americans in cancer elimination efforts.

Indexed as

AdultBhutanBreast NeoplasmsColonic NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMyanmarNeoplasmsOdds RatioRefugees

Identifiers

PMID32226017
PMCPMC7105132
OpenAlexW3013270956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.