Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32225143›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2020

Strategic Screening and Characterization of the Visual GPCR-mini-G Protein Signaling Complex for Successful Crystallization.

Filip Pamula, Jonas Mühle, Alain Blanc, Rony Nehmé, Patricia C Edwards, Christopher G Tate, Ching-Ju Tsai

Open access · greenAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 57% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Filip PamulaLaboratory of Biomolecular Research, Paul Scherrer Institute; Department of Biology, ETH Zürich; filip.pamula@psi.ch.
Jonas MühleLaboratory of Biomolecular Research, Paul Scherrer Institute.
Alain BlancCenter for Radiopharmaceutical Sciences, Paul Scherrer Institute.
Rony NehméLaboratory of Molecular Biology, Medical Research Council.
Patricia C EdwardsLaboratory of Molecular Biology, Medical Research Council.
Christopher G TateLaboratory of Molecular Biology, Medical Research Council.
Ching-Ju TsaiLaboratory of Biomolecular Research, Paul Scherrer Institute; ching-ju.tsai@psi.ch.
Paul Scherrer Institute · CHMRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology · GBETH Zurich · CHMedical Research Council · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105197215Swiss National Science Foundation 153145Swiss National Science Foundation 173335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The key to determining crystal structures of membrane protein complexes is the quality of the sample prior to crystallization. In particular, the choice of detergent is critical, because it affects both the stability and monodispersity of the complex. We recently determined the crystal structure of an active state of bovine rhodopsin coupled to an engineered G protein, mini-Go, at 3.1 Å resolution. Here, we detail the procedure for optimizing the preparation of the rhodopsin-mini-Go complex. Dark-state rhodopsin was prepared in classical and neopentyl glycol (NPG) detergents, followed by complex formation with mini-Go under light exposure. The stability of the rhodopsin was assessed by ultraviolet-visible (UV-VIS) spectroscopy, which monitors the reconstitution into rhodopsin of the light-sensitive ligand, 9-cis retinal. Automated size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) was used to characterize the monodispersity of rhodopsin and the rhodopsin-mini-Go complex. SDS-polyacrylamide electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) confirmed the formation of the complex by identifying a 1:1 molar ratio between rhodopsin and mini-Go after staining the gel with Coomassie blue. After cross-validating all this analytical data, we eliminated unsuitable detergents and continued with the best candidate detergent for large-scale preparation and crystallization. An additional problem arose from the heterogeneity of N-glycosylation. Heterologously-expressed rhodopsin was observed on SDS-PAGE to have two different N-glycosylated populations, which would probably have hindered crystallogenesis. Therefore, different deglycosylation enzymes were tested, and endoglycosidase F1 (EndoF1) produced rhodopsin with a single species of N-glycosylation. With this strategic pipeline for characterizing protein quality, preparation of the rhodopsin-mini-Go complex was optimized to deliver the crystal structure. This was only the third crystal structure of a GPCR-G protein signaling complex. This approach can also be generalized for other membrane proteins and their complexes to facilitate sample preparation and structure determination.

Indexed as

CrystallizationGTP-Binding ProteinsSignal TransductionGTP-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32225143
PMCPMC7250641
OpenAlexW3012320305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.