Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32225014›Full record

ArticleBiomolecules2020

Exploring Alzheimer's Disease Molecular Variability via Calculation of Personalized Transcriptional Signatures.

Hila Dagan, Efrat Flashner-Abramson, Swetha Vasudevan, Maria R Jubran, Ehud Cohen, Nataly Kravchenko-Balasha

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecules, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hila DaganThe Rachel and Selim Benin School of Computer Science and Engineering, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 9190416, Israel.
Efrat Flashner-AbramsonDepartment for Bio-medical Research, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
Swetha VasudevanDepartment for Bio-medical Research, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
Maria R JubranDepartment for Bio-medical Research, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
Ehud CohenDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Institute for Medical Research Israel - Canada, The Hebrew University School of Medicine, Jerusalem 9112102, Israel.
Nataly Kravchenko-BalashaDepartment for Bio-medical Research, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91120, Israel.
Hebrew University of Jerusalem · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite huge investments and major efforts to develop remedies for Alzheimer's disease (AD) in the past decades, AD remains incurable. While evidence for molecular and phenotypic variability in AD have been accumulating, AD research still heavily relies on the search for AD-specific genetic/protein biomarkers that are expected to exhibit repetitive patterns throughout all patients. Thus, the classification of AD patients to different categories is expected to set the basis for the development of therapies that will be beneficial for subpopulations of patients. Here we explore the molecular heterogeneity among a large cohort of AD and non-demented brain samples, aiming to address the question whether AD-specific molecular biomarkers can progress our understanding of the disease and advance the development of anti-AD therapeutics. We studied 951 brain samples, obtained from up to 17 brain regions of 85 AD patients and 22 non-demented subjects. Utilizing an information-theoretic approach, we deciphered the brain sample-specific structures of altered transcriptional networks. Our in-depth analysis revealed that 7 subnetworks were repetitive in the 737 diseased and 214 non-demented brain samples. Each sample was characterized by a subset consisting of ~1-3 subnetworks out of 7, generating 52 distinct altered transcriptional signatures that characterized the 951 samples. We show that 30 different altered transcriptional signatures characterized solely AD samples and were not found in any of the non-demented samples. In contrast, the rest of the signatures characterized different subsets of sample types, demonstrating the high molecular variability and complexity of gene expression in AD. Importantly, different AD patients exhibiting similar expression levels of AD biomarkers harbored distinct altered transcriptional networks. Our results emphasize the need to expand the biomarker-based stratification to patient-specific transcriptional signature identification for improved AD diagnosis and for the development of subclass-specific future treatment.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseApolipoproteins EBrainCalcium SignalingCase-Control StudiesDatabases, GeneticHumansMiddle AgedPrecision MedicineReproducibility of ResultsTranscriptomeApoE protein, humanApolipoproteins Ealtered transcriptional network structureAlzheimer’s diseaseinformation theorypatient-specific transcriptional signaturessurprisal analysis

Identifiers

PMID32225014
PMCPMC7226317
OpenAlexW3014069609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.