SynthesisJBJS reviews2020
Botulinum Toxin A Injection in Treatment of Upper Limb Spasticity in Children with Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Synthesis in JBJS reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Limited Evidence of Functional Benefit After Upper Limb Botulinum Toxin Treatment in Children With Cerebral Palsy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy of botulinum toxin type A for spasticity management and motor function in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Pragmatic single center longitudinal study assessing radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy for patients with severe mental and physical disabilities.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Efficacy and safety of abobotulinumtoxinA for upper limb spasticity in children with cerebral palsy: a randomized repeat-treatment study.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2021Trial
- Do female and male patients with cervical dystonia respond differently to long-term botulinum neurotoxin therapy?Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Stretching exercises in managing spasticity: effectiveness, risks, and adjunct therapies.European journal of translational myology · 2024Article
- The Role of Botulinum Toxin Type-A in Spasticity: Research Trends from a Bibliometric Analysis.Toxins · 2024Review
- Effect of Botulinum Toxin Injections in the Treatment of Spasticity of Different Etiologies: An Umbrella Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
- Time-matched accelerometers on limbs and waist in children with CP give new insights into real-life activities after botulinum toxin treatment: A proof of concept study.Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine · 2023Observational
- A data set for the design and implementation of the upper limb disability registry.Journal of education and health promotion · 2023Article
- Article
- Use of Crystallography and Molecular Modeling for the Inhibition of the Botulinum Neurotoxin A Protease.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2021Article
- Irreversible inhibition of BoNT/A protease: proximity-driven reactivity contingent upon a bifunctional approach.RSC medicinal chemistry · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCerebral palsy (CP) is the most common cause of childhood disability globally. Botulinum toxin A injections are widely used to manage limb spasticity in children with CP. Intramuscular botulinum toxin A has been used in the upper limbs of children with CP to manage preoperative and postoperative pain, facilitate nursing, and achieve functional and/or cosmetic improvement of hand position. These goals are achieved primarily through reduction of spasticity. The aim of this review was to assess the evidence for the effect of botulinum toxin A injections used to manage upper limb spasticity in children with spastic CP. Specifically, we examined the role of botulinum toxin A as an adjunctive treatment to other physical therapy modalities. Additionally, we analyzed the associated complications.
methodsThe literature extraction process involved 4 phases: identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion. We used a combination of Google Scholar, PubMed, and ScienceDirect. The choice of the search terms was based on the Medical Subject Headings. We extracted the relevant studies using a combination of words or terms related to (1) patient population, (2) pathology, (3) clinical intervention, and (4) anatomical distribution of pathology. Studies were included if they were randomized controlled trials conducted on children and/or adolescents with CP targeting the upper extremities in which botulinum toxin A was used as an adjunctive treatment to a primary intervention.
resultsThe literature extraction process yielded 15 randomized controlled trials for inclusion in this review. The total number of participants enrolled in the included studies was 499, with 255 in the intervention group (51%) and 244 controls (49%). All participants in the eligible studies had unilateral spastic CP except for those in 4 studies (27%) with 198 participants (40%) that included a heterogeneous sample of unilateral and bilateral spastic CP. The mean age of participants in the intervention group ranged from 2.6 to 10.7 years among the individual studies. The mean age of participants in the control group ranged from 3.1 to 10.55 years among the individual studies. This review indicated that botulinum toxin A had a positive effect on the degree of spasticity and cosmetic appearance of the injected upper limb. The results with respect to functional gains and quality of life were either conflicting or not significant.
conclusionsRandomized controlled trials of botulinum toxin A injection in the treatment of upper limb spasticity in children with CP used variable outcome measures and yielded mixed results. Overall, there is some evidence to support the use of botulinum toxin A as an adjuvant treatment to other physical therapy regimens or placebo to reduce spasticity in the short term. There is insufficient evidence to support its use as an adjunctive treatment to improve upper limb function or quality of life. The complications were acceptable and did not outweigh the clinical gains incurred. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.