Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32224495›Full record

ReviewDisease models & mechanisms2020

Mouse models for muscular dystrophies: an overview.

Maaike van Putten, Erin M Lloyd, Jessica C de Greef, Vered Raz, Raffaella Willmann, Miranda D Grounds

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Disease models & mechanisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SORT LNPs encapsulating Cas9 mRNA achieve efficient editing in skeletal muscle in a dystrophic mouse model.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Pax7 reporter mouse models: a pocket guide for satellite cell research.European journal of translational myology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Maaike van PuttenLeiden University Medical Center, Department of Human Genetics, Leiden, 2333 ZA, The Netherlands m.van_putten@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0683-8897
Erin M LloydThe University of Western Australia, School of Human Sciences, Perth 6009, Australia.
Jessica C de GreefLeiden University Medical Center, Department of Human Genetics, Leiden, 2333 ZA, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2819-6098
Vered RazLeiden University Medical Center, Department of Human Genetics, Leiden, 2333 ZA, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3152-1952
Raffaella WillmannUniversity of Basel, Biozentrum, Basel, CH-4056, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5949-0900
Miranda D GroundsThe University of Western Australia, School of Human Sciences, Perth 6009, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4530-9402
Leiden University Medical Center · NLThe University of Western Australia · AUUniversity of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscular dystrophies (MDs) encompass a wide variety of inherited disorders that are characterized by loss of muscle tissue associated with a progressive reduction in muscle function. With a cure lacking for MDs, preclinical developments of therapeutic approaches depend on well-characterized animal models that recapitulate the specific pathology in patients. The mouse is the most widely and extensively used model for MDs, and it has played a key role in our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying MD pathogenesis. This has enabled the development of therapeutic strategies. Owing to advancements in genetic engineering, a wide variety of mouse models are available for the majority of MDs. Here, we summarize the characteristics of the most commonly used mouse models for a subset of highly studied MDs, collated into a table. Together with references to key publications describing these models, this brief but detailed overview would be useful for those interested in, or working with, mouse models of MD.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsGene TargetingMiceMuscular DystrophiesDisease pathologyMouse modelsMuscular dystrophy

Identifiers

PMID32224495
PMCPMC7044454
OpenAlexW3008644720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.