ArticleJournal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus2020
Reliability and validity of the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales in pediatric vision impairment.
Article in Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Childhood visual impairment and health-related quality of life in Ghana: evidence from a cross-sectional study.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Effect of Surgery on Psychosocial Function and Quality of Life in Children with Simple Congenital Ptosis and Their Parents.Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2024Article
- Subjective vision assessment in companion dogs using dogVLQ demonstrates age-associated visual dysfunction.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- The Impact of Self-Care Recommendations with and without Tilt-Training on Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents with Vasovagal Syncope: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe PedsQL 4.0 is a generic health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) instrument that has been used across many pediatric health conditions. The purpose of this study was to investigate its use in children with vision impairment and to test its ability to distinguish between visually impaired and normally sighted children.
methodsChildren with vision impairment and age-matched controls underwent vision testing, including binocular best-corrected distance visual acuity. They completed the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scale Child Report (ages 8-12) or Teen Report (ages 13-18), as appropriate. Parents completed the Parent Proxy Report in a room separate from their children. Analyses included descriptive statistics, intraclass correlations, t tests, and determination of Cronbach's α for subscales.
resultsA total of 70 study subjects and 44 controls were included. Groups were similar with regard to age, race, and sex. PedsQL 4.0 subscales showed no floor effects; however, some scales had ceiling effects of up to 28% in certain groups. Cronbach's α was excellent (0.88) for all subscales and reports. PedsQL 4.0 total score for children with vision impairment differed significantly from that for normally sighted children for both age groups and for both parent and child reports. Total score was also significantly associated with visual acuity. Parent and child reports correlated poorly (ICC, <0.5), highlighting the importance of both perspectives.
conclusionsThe PedsQL 4.0 can be used to assess HRQoL in children and teens with low vision. It has internal consistency reliability, and construct validity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.