ArticleGene2020
Transplant chimerism in porcine structural vascularized bone allotransplants.
Article in Gene, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBone allotransplant viability can be maintained long-term by implanting arteriovenous (AV) bundles and creating an autogenous neoangiogenic circulation. Only short-term immunosuppression is required. This study investigates the origin of viable osteocytes observed in areas of active bone remodeling in orthotopically transplanted tibiae in a Yucatan mini-pig model.
methodsSegmental tibial defects created in female Yucatan minipigs (N = 14) were reconstructed with a matched vascularized composite allotransplant from a male donor. The circulation was microsurgically restored, with simultaneous autogenous AV-bundle implantation in group 1 (N = 7). A ligated AV-bundle was implanted as a no-angiogenesis control in group 2 (N = 7). After 20-weeks, repopulation of the allotransplant was assessed by real-time qPCR measurement of relative copy numbers of a Y chromosome-specific gene (SRY) and an autosomal housekeeping gene, ribosomal protein L4 (RPL4). A lower SRY/RPL4 ratio demonstrates replacement of male allogeneic cells with female, autogenous cells in the sample. Genomic DNA was extracted from cross-sections of the allotransplant, liver and spleen. Additionally, areas of new bone formation within the allotransplant were sampled by laser capture microdissection. A comparison was made between groups as well as male control samples. RNA was extracted from bone as well, as a measure of metabolically active cells.
resultsLaser-captured areas of new bone formation in animals with both normal and ligated AV-bundles were found to have significantly lower relative copy numbers of SRY (p = 0.03) than control specimens from male bone, indicating replacement by female (autogenous) bone-forming cells. Analysis of an entire segment of the allotransplant from Group 1 was similarly reduced (p = 0.04), unlike that from Group 2. RNA expression of SRY was observed in both groups. No chimerism could be found in non-bone tissues (liver and spleen).
conclusionWe observed a significant level of transplant chimerism in areas of new bone formation sampled by laser capture microdissection. The migration of autogenous cells including osteocytes was seen in both groups. Survival of some allogeneic (male) cells was also demonstrable. No microchimerism was found in liver and spleen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.