Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32223890›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

Theoretical relation between axon initial segment geometry and excitability.

Sarah Goethals, Romain Brette

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A neuron type-specific microexon inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Theory of axo-axonic inhibition.PLoS computational biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Intrinsic Plasticity Mechanisms of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah GoethalsSorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France.
Romain BretteSorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0110-1623

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-14-CE13-0003Ecole des Neurosciences de Paris N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In most vertebrate neurons, action potentials are triggered at the distal end of the axon initial segment (AIS). Both position and length of the AIS vary across and within neuron types, with activity, development and pathology. What is the impact of AIS geometry on excitability? Direct empirical assessment has proven difficult because of the many potential confounding factors. Here, we carried a principled theoretical analysis to answer this question. We provide a simple formula relating AIS geometry and sodium conductance density to the somatic voltage threshold. A distal shift of the AIS normally produces a (modest) increase in excitability, but we explain how this pattern can reverse if a hyperpolarizing current is present at the AIS, due to resistive coupling with the soma. This work provides a theoretical tool to assess the significance of structural AIS plasticity for electrical function.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAxon Initial SegmentAxonsHumansModels, NeurologicalModels, TheoreticalNeuronal PlasticityNeuronsaxon initial segmentcable theorycomputational biologyexcitabilityneurosciencenonestructural plasticitysystems biology

Identifiers

PMID32223890
PMCPMC7170651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.