Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32223602›Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2020

Process and Clinical Outcomes of a Biosimilar Adoption Program with Infliximab-Dyyb.

Shubha Bhat, Sarah Altajar, Divya Shankar, Toni Zahorian, Regine Robert, Taha Qazi, Bhavesh Shah, Francis A Farraye

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Introducing the Biosimilar Paradigm to Neurology: The Totality of Evidence for the First Biosimilar Natalizumab.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2024
    Review
  6. Biosimilars in IBD: What Every Clinician Needs to Know.Current gastroenterology reports · 2024
    Review
  7. An Update on Anti-TNF Biosimilar Switching-Real-World Clinical Effectiveness and Safety.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Switching from Biologic to Biosimilar Products: Insight from an Integrated Health Care System.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shubha BhatDepartment of Pharmacy, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sarah AltajarDepartment of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Divya ShankarDepartment of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Toni ZahorianDepartment of Pharmacy, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Regine RobertDepartment of Pharmacy, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Taha QaziDepartment of Gastroenterology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Bhavesh ShahDepartment of Pharmacy, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Francis A FarrayeInflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Boston Medical Center · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2016, the FDA approved infliximab-dyyb (IFX-dyyb) as a biosimilar to infliximab (IFX). Deemed to have comparable efficacy and safety to IFX, IFX-dyyb is 20%-30% less expensive, allowing significant cost savings for institutions and some payers. In 2018, IFX was reported to be the drug with the highest spend since 2013, costing $3.8 billion; however, transition to IFX-dyyb would save $1.1 billion. Regardless, many institutions have not transitioned to IFX-dyyb or other IFX biosimilars (e.g., IFX-abda) because of concerns about clinical outcomes, uncertainty regarding financial impact, and barriers to operationalizing biosimilar adoption. At Boston Medical Center, a decision was made in March 2018 to adopt IFX-dyyb and transition patients who have been on IFX for ≥ 6 months for all indications to IFX-dyyb.

objectivesTo (a) describe a biosimilar adoption process of IFX-dyyb in patients on IFX for ≥ 6 months; (b) characterize cost savings of transitioning patients to IFX-dyyb; and (c) evaluate real-world clinical outcomes of adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who transitioned to IFX-dyyb.

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of patients eligible for the IFX-dyyb switch from March 2018 to June 2019 at a large academic medical center. For process outcomes, we collected the proportion of patients who transitioned to IFX-dyyb and calculated the cost savings generated. To assess clinical outcomes of adult IBD patients who transitioned, we collected IFX and IFX-dyyb dosage, Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) or Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index (SCCAI) scores, c-reactive protein (CRP) levels, and colonoscopy results. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and McNemar's test were used for statistical analyses.

resultsOf 151 eligible patients, 146 (97%) successfully transitioned to IFX-dyyb. Based on our conversion rate to IFX-dyyb, our health system is forecasted to save approximately $500,000 annually. From March to June 2018, 63 of 75 (84%) eligible IBD patients transitioned from IFX to IFX-dyyb. In this cohort, of the 40 patients with HBI or SCCAI scores before and after transition, 36 (90%) maintained remission. For 32 patients, the mean CRP (SD) before transition was 11.2 (22) and 4.1 (4.8) after transition (

conclusionsImplementation of a biosimilar adoption program can be successful and result in significant cost savings without compromising clinical outcomes. A model that uses actionable strategies and embraces collaboration among stakeholders is described here, with outcomes demonstrating successful IFX-dyyb uptake and no changes in clinical outcomes of transitioned adult patients with IBD. DISCLOSURES: No outside funding supported this study. Farraye reports advisory board fees from Janssen, Merck, and Pfizer. Shah reports speaker fees from Pfizer. The other authors have nothing to disclose.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersAdultBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsColitis, UlcerativeColonoscopyCost SavingsCrohn DiseaseDrug CostsDrug SubstitutionFemaleGastrointestinal AgentsHumansInfliximabMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsGastrointestinal AgentsInfliximab

Identifiers

PMID32223602
PMCPMC10390955
OpenAlexW3013092369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.