Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32223599›Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2020

Augmenting Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Uncertainty: The Implications for Value Assessment-Rationale and Empirical Support.

Louis P Garrison, Bernarda Zamora, Meng Li, Adrian Towse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Reflecting Social Values in HTA Methods: A Case Study of South Africa.Applied health economics and health policy · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Val (EU) xit: do we need an international ISPOR value flower?Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A review of HTA guidelines on societal and novel value elements.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Augmenting Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Will Not Improve Affordability.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Louis P GarrisonThe Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle.
Bernarda ZamoraOffice of Health Economics, London, United Kingdom.
Meng LiLeonard D. Schaeffer Center For Health Policy & Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Adrian TowseOffice of Health Economics, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

disclosuresThis study received unrestricted funding from the Pharmaceutical Research Manufacturers of America. The authors also do consulting, personally or through their employment, with numerous pharmaceutical manufacturers, payers, and other stakeholders with a general interest in this subject matter.

Indexed as

UncertaintyAdvisory CommitteesCost-Benefit AnalysisDecision Making, OrganizationalDrug CostsHopeInsurance, Pharmaceutical ServicesPharmacy ResearchQuality-Adjusted Life YearsUnited StatesValue-Based Health Insurance

Identifiers

PMID32223599
PMCPMC10391119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.