Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32223422›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias

How Evidence-Based Practice (E

Leanne Ruggero, Karen Croot, Lyndsey Nickels

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leanne RuggeroDepartment of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8278-8174
Karen CrootDepartment of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9459-2913
Lyndsey NickelsDepartment of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0311-3524
Macquarie University · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amelioration of communication impairment in primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is an area of clinical importance and current research. Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) have a range of skills and interventions to support communication in PPA; however, underrecognition of their role and low referral rates is an ongoing concern. The E

Indexed as

Aphasia, Primary ProgressiveCommunicationEvidence-Based PracticeSpeech-Language PathologyHumansQuality of Lifecommunicationevidence-based medicineevidence-based practiceprimary progressive aphasiaspeech and language pathology

Identifiers

PMID32223422
PMCPMC10623930
OpenAlexW3014202746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.