ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2020
Enhancing Top-Down Proteomics Data Analysis by Combining Deconvolution Results through a Machine Learning Strategy.
Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncovering hidden protein modifications with native top-down mass spectrometry.Nature methods · 2025Article
- A Fast Neural Network for Isotopic Charge State Assignment.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
- Deciphering Proteoform Landscape of Mammary Carcinoma by Top-Down Proteomics.Journal of proteome research · 2025Article
- Top-down mass spectrometry of native proteoforms and their complexes: a community study.Nature methods · 2024Article
- MASH Native: a unified solution for native top-down proteomics data processing.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Deep Learning in Phosphoproteomics: Methods and Application in Cancer Drug Discovery.Proteomes · 2023Review
- Advances, obstacles, and opportunities for machine learning in proteomics.Cell reports. Physical science · 2022Article
- Structural O-Glycoform Heterogeneity of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Receptor-Binding Domain Revealed by Top-Down Mass Spectrometry.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2021Article
- COVID-19 deep classification network based on convolution and deconvolution local enhancement.Computers in biology and medicine · 2021Article
- Novel Strategies to Address the Challenges in Top-Down Proteomics.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2021Review
- Mass Spectrometry-Based Structural Analysis of Cysteine-Rich Metal-Binding Sites in Proteins with MetaOdysseus R Software.Journal of proteome research · 2021Article
- Top-down proteomics: challenges, innovations, and applications in basic and clinical research.Expert review of proteomics · 2020Article
- MASH Explorer: A Universal Software Environment for Top-Down Proteomics.Journal of proteome research · 2020Article
- Unraveling Posttranslational Modification Complexity: Advances in Quantitative Histone Proteoform Mass Spectrometry.Mass spectrometry reviewsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Top-down mass spectrometry (MS) is a powerful tool for the identification and comprehensive characterization of proteoforms arising from alternative splicing, sequence variation, and post-translational modifications. However, the complex data set generated from top-down MS experiments requires multiple sequential data processing steps to successfully interpret the data for identifying and characterizing proteoforms. One critical step is the deconvolution of the complex isotopic distribution that arises from naturally occurring isotopes. Multiple algorithms are currently available to deconvolute top-down mass spectra, resulting in different deconvoluted peak lists with varied accuracy compared to true positive annotations. In this study, we have designed a machine learning strategy that can process and combine the peak lists from different deconvolution results. By optimizing clustering results, deconvolution results from THRASH, TopFD, MS-Deconv, and SNAP algorithms were combined into consensus peak lists at various thresholds using either a simple voting ensemble method or a random forest machine learning algorithm. For the random forest algorithm, which had better predictive performance, the consensus peak lists on average could achieve a recall value (true positive rate) of 0.60 and a precision value (positive predictive value) of 0.78. It outperforms the single best algorithm, which achieved a recall value of only 0.47 and a precision value of 0.58. This machine learning strategy enhanced the accuracy and confidence in protein identification during database searches by accelerating the detection of true positive peaks while filtering out false positive peaks. Thus, this method shows promise in enhancing proteoform identification and characterization for high-throughput data analysis in top-down proteomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.