Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32223200›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2020

Enhancing Top-Down Proteomics Data Analysis by Combining Deconvolution Results through a Machine Learning Strategy.

Sean J McIlwain, Zhijie Wu, Molly Wetzel, Daniel Belongia, Yutong Jin, Kent Wenger, Irene M Ong, Ying Ge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A Fast Neural Network for Isotopic Charge State Assignment.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Novel Strategies to Address the Challenges in Top-Down Proteomics.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Funding

Enabling Top-Down Proteomics through Materials Chemistry and NanotechnologyR01GM117058 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GE, YING, JIN, SONG · 2015 to 2023
$2.7M
Ultra High Resolution Mass Spectrometer for Biomedical ResearchS10OD018475 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GE, YING · 2015 to 2015
$2.0M
MASH Explorer, a Comprehensive Software Environment for Top-Down ProteomicsR01GM125085 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GE, YING · 2018 to 2021
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM117058NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM125085NIH HHS S10 OD018475
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Top-down mass spectrometry (MS) is a powerful tool for the identification and comprehensive characterization of proteoforms arising from alternative splicing, sequence variation, and post-translational modifications. However, the complex data set generated from top-down MS experiments requires multiple sequential data processing steps to successfully interpret the data for identifying and characterizing proteoforms. One critical step is the deconvolution of the complex isotopic distribution that arises from naturally occurring isotopes. Multiple algorithms are currently available to deconvolute top-down mass spectra, resulting in different deconvoluted peak lists with varied accuracy compared to true positive annotations. In this study, we have designed a machine learning strategy that can process and combine the peak lists from different deconvolution results. By optimizing clustering results, deconvolution results from THRASH, TopFD, MS-Deconv, and SNAP algorithms were combined into consensus peak lists at various thresholds using either a simple voting ensemble method or a random forest machine learning algorithm. For the random forest algorithm, which had better predictive performance, the consensus peak lists on average could achieve a recall value (true positive rate) of 0.60 and a precision value (positive predictive value) of 0.78. It outperforms the single best algorithm, which achieved a recall value of only 0.47 and a precision value of 0.58. This machine learning strategy enhanced the accuracy and confidence in protein identification during database searches by accelerating the detection of true positive peaks while filtering out false positive peaks. Thus, this method shows promise in enhancing proteoform identification and characterization for high-throughput data analysis in top-down proteomics.

Indexed as

Data AnalysisMachine LearningAlgorithmsAlternative SplicingHumansMuscle ProteinsProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProteomicsSarcomeresSensitivity and SpecificityTandem Mass SpectrometryMuscle Proteinsmachine learning ensembletop-down mass spectrometry

Identifiers

PMID32223200
PMCPMC7909725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.