ArticleTargeted oncology2020
Oral Azacitidine and Cedazuridine Approximate Parenteral Azacitidine Efficacy in Murine Model.
Article in Targeted oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanisms Underlying Cedazuridine-Mediated Enhancement of Oral Decitabine Bioavailability.Cancer research communications · 2026Article
- Nanotechnology-driven Epigenetic Cancer Therapy: Precision Delivery and Sustained Release of DNA Methylation Modulators.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2025Review
- Pharmacokinetic assessment of low dose decitabine in combination therapies: Development and validation of a sensitive UHPLC-MS/MS method for murine plasma analysis.Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences · 2024Article
- Transplant Eligible and Ineligible Elderly Patients with AML-A Genomic Approach and Next Generation Questions.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Changing paradigms in oncology: Toward noncytotoxic treatments for advanced gliomas.International journal of cancer · 2022Review
- Boosting the oral bioavailability of anticancer drugs through intentional drug-drug interactions.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2022Review
- Review
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes in the Postgenomic Era and Future Perspectives for Precision Medicine.Cancers · 2021Review
- Cedazuridine/decitabine: from preclinical to clinical development in myeloid malignancies.Blood advances · 2021Review
- Deciphering the Key Pharmacological Pathways and Targets of Yisui Qinghuang Powder That Acts on Myelodysplastic Syndromes Using a Network Pharmacology-Based Strategy.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTis) improve survival for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and those with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) unable to receive standard cytotoxic chemotherapy and are, accordingly, the backbone of standard-of-care treatment for these conditions. Standard regimens with DNMTIs, decitabine (DEC) or azacitidine (AZA) include daily subcutaneous (s.c.) or intravenous (i.v.) administration for 5-7 consecutive days. Attempts to provide the therapy orally have been limited given rapid clearance of the agents by the enzyme cytidine deaminase (CDA), which is ubiquitous in the gut and liver as part of first-pass metabolism. Recently, cedazuridine (CDZ), an oral inhibitor of CDA, was successfully combined with DEC to approximate the pharmacokinetics of i.v. DEC in patients.
objectiveTo determine if an oral dosing strategy might be feasible in the clinic with AZA, we attempted to increase the bioavailability of oral AZA through the use of CDZ, in a murine model.
methodsFollowing pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessment of oral AZA dosed with CDZ in murine and monkey models, we tested this regimen in vivo with a human cell line-derived xenograft transplantation experiment (CDX). Following this we combined the regimen with venetoclax (VEN) to test the efficacy of an all-oral regimen in a patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model.
resultsParenteral AZA and oral AZA + CDZ exhibited similar pharmacokinetic profiles, and efficacy against human AML cells. Tumor regression was seen with AZA + CDZ in MOLM-13 CDX and PDX models.
conclusionsWe conclude that oral AZA when combined with CDZ achieves successful tumor regression in both CDX and PDX models. Furthermore, the combination of AZA + CDZ with VEN in a PDX model emulated responses seen with VEN + AZA in the clinic, implying a potential all-oral VEN-based therapy opportunity in myeloid diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.