ArticleHuman pathology2020
Regenerative hepatic pseudotumor: a new pseudotumor of the liver.
Article in Human pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Segmental Atrophy of the Liver: An Increasingly Recognized Pseudotumor With Distinct Clinicopathologic and Imaging Features.The American journal of surgical pathology · 2026Article
- Segmental atrophy of the liver: Review of a rare pseudotumor.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
- Hepatic pseudotumor: A diagnostic challenge.World journal of hepatology · 2024Article
- Hepatic pseudotumor associated withWorld journal of hepatology · 2023Article
- Uncommon Benign Neoplasms and Pseudotumors of the Liver.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Cases of new pseudotumors of the liver were collected from multiple medical centers. Four resection and 4 biopsy specimens were collected, including 4 women and 4 men at an average age of 48 ± 15 years (range: 28-73 years). The lesions were visible on imaging but were either ill-defined or had indeterminate features for characterization. They ranged in size from 2 to 9 cm and were multiple in five cases. The resection specimens showed lesions that had vague borders but were visible in juxtaposition to the normal liver on gross examination. Histologically, the lesions also had ill-defined borders and were composed of benign reactive liver parenchyma. Central vein thrombi were seen in 5 cases, and portal vein thrombi, in 2 cases. These vascular changes were associated reactive parenchymal changes including sinusoidal dilation, patchy bile ductular proliferation, and portal vein abnormalities. All lesions lacked the histological findings of hepatic adenomas, focal nodular hyperplasia, or other known tumors and pseudotumors of the liver. In summary, this study provides a detailed description of a new pseudotumor of the liver: a reactive, hyperplastic mass-like lesion that forms in association with localized vascular thrombi, for which we propose the term regenerative hepatic pseudotumor. This lesion can closely mimic other benign or malignant hepatic tumors on imaging and histology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.