Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32222318›Full record

ReviewTrends in pharmacological sciences2020

Critical Assessment of Targeted Protein Degradation as a Research Tool and Pharmacological Modality.

Milka Kostic, Lyn H Jones

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in pharmacological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. F-boxing substrates away.Nature chemical biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Milka KosticDepartment of Cancer Biology and Chemical Biology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA. Electronic address: milka_kostic@dfci.harvard.edu.
Lyn H JonesCenter for Protein Degradation, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 360 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02215, USA. Electronic address: lyn_jones@dfci.harvard.edu.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Cancer Chemical Biology and Metabolism Training ProgramT32CA236754 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Nika N Danial, THOMAS M ROBERTS · 2019 to 2026
$2.6M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA236754
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small molecules continue to dominate drug discovery because of their ease of use, lower cost of manufacturing, and access to intracellular targets. However, despite these advantages, small molecules are more likely to fail in clinical trials compared with biologicals and their development remains limited to a small subset of disease-relevant 'druggable' targets. Targeted protein degradation has recently emerged as a novel pharmacological modality that promises to overcome small molecule limitations whilst retaining their key advantages. Here, we use a Strengths-Weaknesses-Opportunities-Threats (SWOT) framework to critically assess the current status of this rapidly evolving field. We expect that degrader molecules are only the beginning of a range of novel targeting modalities that hijack existing endogenous cellular machineries to chemically redirect biological targets and pathways. Therefore, this piece may offer a roadmap for enhancing development of both degraders and related modalities.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryHumansProteolysisdegrader moleculessmall molecule drug discoverytargeted protein degradationundruggable targets

Identifiers

PMID32222318
PMCPMC7202367
OpenAlexW3013296766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.