Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32221989›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2020

The project REBOOT protocol: Evaluating a personalized inhibitory control training as an adjunct to cognitive behavioral therapy for bulimia nervosa and binge-eating disorder.

Stephanie M Manasse, Elizabeth W Lampe, Lindsay Gillikin, Adam Payne-Reichert, Fengqing Zhang, Adrienne S Juarascio, Evan M Forman

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. IJED support for eating disorders research in the time of COVID-19.The International journal of eating disorders · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie M ManasseCenter for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-4666-588X
Elizabeth W LampeCenter for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Lindsay GillikinCenter for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Adam Payne-ReichertCenter for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Fengqing ZhangDepartment of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Adrienne S JuarascioCenter for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Evan M FormanCenter for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Drexel University · US

Funding

Augmenting cognitive behavioral therapy with inhibitory control trainingR34MH118353 · NIMH · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI MANASSE, STEPHANIE · 2019 to 2021
$704k
NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH118353
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Outcomes from cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for bulimia nervosa (BN) and binge-eating disorder (BED) are suboptimal. One potential explanation is that CBT fails to adequately target inhibitory control (i.e., the ability to withhold an automatic response), which is a key maintenance factor for binge eating. Computerized inhibitory control training (ICT) is a promising method for improving inhibitory control but is relatively untested in BN/BED. The present study will evaluate a computer-based ICT as an adjunct to CBT for BN/BED. Participants with BN (n = 30) or BED (n = 30) will be randomized to 12 weeks of either CBT + ICT or CBT + a sham training. Trainings will be completed daily for 4 weeks and weekly for 8 weeks. Primary aims include the following: (a) confirm target engagement (evaluate whether ICT improves inhibitory control), (b) test target validation (evaluate whether improvements in inhibitory control are associated with improvements in binge eating), and (c) evaluate the incremental efficacy of ICT on binge eating. Secondary aims include the following: (a) evaluate ICT feasibility and acceptability and (b) assess the moderating effects of approach tendencies on highly palatable food, dietary restraint, and diagnosis. Data will be used to shape a fully powered clinical trial designed to assess efficacy and dose-response effects of ICT for BN/BED.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBinge-Eating DisorderBulimia NervosaCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignYoung Adultbinge-eating disorderbulimia nervosacognitive behavioral therapyinhibitory control training

Identifiers

PMID32221989
PMCPMC7283009
OpenAlexW3013322537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.