Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32221947›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2020

Sorting the Muck from the Brass: Analysis of Protein Complexes and Cell Lysates.

Martin Zoltner, Ricardo Canavate Del Pino, Mark C Field

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Martin ZoltnerSchool of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Ricardo Canavate Del PinoSchool of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Mark C FieldSchool of Life Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N010558/1Medical Research Council MR/P009018/Medical Research Council MR/P009018/1Wellcome Trust 203134/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 204697/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable determination of protein complex composition or changes to protein levels in whole cells is challenging. Despite the multitude of methods now available for labeling, analysis, and the statistical processing of data, this large variety is of itself an issue: Which approach is most appropriate, where do you set cutoffs, and what is the most cost-effective strategy? One size does not fit all for such work, but some guidelines can help in terms of reducing cost, improving data quality, and ultimately advancing investigations. Here we describe two protocols and algorithms for facile sample preparation for mass spectrometric analysis, robust data processing, and considerations of how to interpret large proteomic datasets in a productive and robust manner.

Indexed as

Datasets as TopicElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelMass SpectrometryMultiprotein ComplexesProteomicsProtozoan ProteinsTrypanosoma brucei bruceiMultiprotein ComplexesProtozoan ProteinsData presentationMaxQuantProteomicsSample preparationSDS-PAGETrypanosoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.