Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32221913›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2020

Tsetse Fly Transmission Studies of African Trypanosomes.

Lori Peacock, Wendy Gibson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lori PeacockBristol Veterinary School and School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Wendy GibsonBristol Veterinary School and School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. w.gibson@bristol.ac.uk.
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R010188/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African trypanosomes are naturally transmitted by bloodsucking tsetse flies in sub-Saharan Africa and these transmission cycles can be reproduced in the laboratory if clean tsetse flies and suitable trypanosomes are available for experiments. Tsetse transmission gives access to more trypanosome developmental stages than are available from in vitro culture, albeit in very small numbers; for example, the sexual stages of Trypanosoma brucei have been isolated from infected tsetse salivary glands, but have not yet been reported from culture. Tsetse transmission also allows for the natural transition between different developmental stages to be studied.Both wild-type and genetically modified trypanosomes have been successfully fly transmitted, and it is possible to manipulate the trypanosome environment inside the fly to some extent, for example, the induction of expression of genes controlled by the Tet repressor by feeding flies with tetracycline.

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleHumansInsect VectorsLife Cycle StagesMaleParasitologySalivary GlandsTrypanosoma brucei bruceiTrypanosomiasis, AfricanTsetse FliesCibariumGlossinaProboscisProventriculusSalivary glandsTrypanosoma bruceiTrypanosoma congolenseTsetse

Identifiers

PMID32221913
OpenAlexW3013129083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.