Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32221844›Full record

ArticleLearning & behavior2020

Awareness of danger inside the egg: Evidence of innate and learned predator recognition in cuttlefish embryos.

Nawel Mezrai, Lorenzo Arduini, Ludovic Dickel, Chuan-Chin Chiao, Anne-Sophie Darmaillacq

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nawel MezraiCentre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation Equipe 7 Ethologie Développementale et Psychologie cognitive, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté / INRA / CNRS, 3032, Dijon, France.
Lorenzo ArduiniNormandie University, UNICAEN, University of Rennes, CNRS, EthoS (Éthologie animale et humaine) - UMR 6552, F-14000, Caen, France.
Ludovic DickelNormandie University, UNICAEN, University of Rennes, CNRS, EthoS (Éthologie animale et humaine) - UMR 6552, F-14000, Caen, France.
Chuan-Chin ChiaoInstitute of Systems Neuroscience and Department of Life Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Anne-Sophie DarmaillacqNormandie University, UNICAEN, University of Rennes, CNRS, EthoS (Éthologie animale et humaine) - UMR 6552, F-14000, Caen, France. anne-sophie.darmaillacq@unicaen.fr.
Ethologie animale et humaineNational Tsing Hua University · TWUniversité de Bourgogne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predation can be a very strong selective pressure on prey. Many studies have shown the existence of innate anti-predator responses, mostly in the early developmental stages of juvenile vertebrates. Learning to recognize predators is another possible defensive resource, but such a method involves a high death risk. There is evidence that prenatal learning exists in animals but few studies have explicitly tested for embryonic learning. The aim of this study was to test innate and learned predator recognition in cuttlefish embryos. For this, naïve embryos were exposed to chemical and visual cues emanating from predators, non-predators, and ink. Their response was assessed by measuring their ventilation rate (VR). We first show that VR decreased in response to both visual and chemical predatory cues and ink but not to non-predatory cues. Second, we show that when non-predatory cues (visual or chemical) are paired with predatory cues or ink for several days, embryonic VR significantly decreased. Such a response is likely adaptive, especially in a translucent egg, since it results in reduced movement and hence may lower the risk of detection by visual predators. This freezing-like behavior may also reduce the bioelectric field, thus lessening the predation risk by non-visual foragers. Our results report that cuttlefish embryos had an innate capacity to differentiate between harmless and harmful chemical and visual cues. They were also capable of learning to respond to harmless cues when they were paired with danger (predator or ink) based on conditioning. The combination of these behavioral mechanisms is an example of the early adaptability of cephalopods. Such behavioral plasticity may give the newly hatched cuttlefish a selective advantage when dealing with either known or unfamiliar threats. Nevertheless, more experiments are needed to test the efficiency of the embryos' response faced with known or new predators.

Indexed as

DecapodiformesLearningAnimalsCuesPredatory BehaviorRecognition, PsychologyCephalopodPredatory cues recognitionPrenatal learningVentilation rate

Identifiers

PMID32221844
OpenAlexW3013053416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.