ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020
Toxicity evaluation of iron oxide nanoparticles and accumulation by microalgae Coelastrella terrestris.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Toxicity of Engineered Nanomaterials to Microalgae: Mechanisms, Modulating Factors, Combined Effects, and Methodological Advances.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Toxicity potential assessment of silicon dioxide (SiOInternational microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025Article
- Effects of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles in Zebrafish.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022Review
- Zero-Valent Iron Nanoparticles Induce Reactive Oxygen Species in the Cyanobacterium,ACS omega · 2021Article
- Interaction Effect of EDTA, Salinity, and Oxide Nanoparticles on AlgaPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Metal- and metal/oxide-based engineered nanoparticles and nanostructures: a review on the applications, nanotoxicological effects, and risk control strategies.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Uses of iron oxide nanoparticles have increased in the last decade. The increased application marked a concern regarding their fate and behavior in the environment. Especially towards the aquatic ecosystems, as the ultimate descend of these iron oxide nanoparticles are aquatic bodies. The greater surface area per mass compared with larger-sized materials of the same chemistry renders these nanoparticles biologically more active. Therefore, it is imperative to assess their eco-toxicogical impact on aquatic eco-systems. In the present study, comparative assessment of iron oxide nanoparticles and their bulk counterpart have been monitored using Coelastrella terrestris up to 40 days. Interestingly, study reveals the potential of Coelastrella terrestris as tool for the bioremediation of iron nanoparticles to combat nano-pollution. Adsorption/absorption kinetics measured after 25 days of treatments with iron oxide nanoparticle and its bulk counterpart revealed higher absorption levels in comparison to the adsorption with maximum accumulation factor (AF) of 2.984 at 50 mg L
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.