Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32221826›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2020

Quality assessment and cost saving of renal dosing recommendation by clinical pharmacists at medical wards in Thailand.

Sayamon Sukkha, Wipharak Rattanavipanon, Benjawan Chamroenwit, Malita Sanganurak, Surakit Nathisuwan, Usa Chaikledkaew, Junporn Kongwatcharapong

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sayamon SukkhaDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4105-3665
Wipharak RattanavipanonDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8220-3490
Benjawan ChamroenwitDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Malita SanganurakDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Surakit NathisuwanDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4828-4412
Usa ChaikledkaewDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Junporn KongwatcharapongDepartment of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Wanglang Road, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok, 10700, Thailand. jkwatcharapong@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8979-1018

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Renal dosage adjustment for patients with reduced kidney function is a common function of clinical pharmacy service. Assessment of pharmacist's intervention in the aspect of quality and economic impact should be conducted to evaluate the benefit of this service. Objective This study aimed to assess the quality and cost saving of clinical pharmacists' recommendation on renal dosage adjustment among patients with reduced kidney function. Setting Eight medical wards of the Siriraj Hospital, a tertiary-care hospital in Bangkok, Thailand. Method A retrospective study was conducted using medical records and clinical pharmacist's intervention database. All patients admitted to the study wards whose estimated creatinine clearance were less than 60 mL/min or presented with acute kidney injury on admission during October 2016-December 2017 were included. The targeted medications were antimicrobial agents. Main outcome measure Percentage of the concordance between pharmacists' recommendation compared to standard dosing references and related cost saving. Results Among 158 patients, pharmacists provided 190 recommendations, including 151 (79.1%) dose reduction, 17 (8.9%) dose increase and 22 (11.5%) recommendations to provide supplemental dose after dialysis. These recommendations were 90.5% consistent with standard references. Physician accepted and complied with 89.5% of pharmacists' recommendations. Average direct cost saving was €5,114.11 while cost avoidance was €863.47. Conclusion Trained clinical pharmacists were able to provide high-quality recommendation on dosage adjustment in these patients in accordance to standard dosing guidelines. In addition, dosage adjustment also led to a significant direct cost saving and cost avoidance from prevention of adverse drug reactions.

Indexed as

Professional RoleAgedAged, 80 and overCost SavingsDrug Dosage CalculationsFemaleHospital DepartmentsHumansKidney DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedPharmacistsPharmacy Service, HospitalQuality Assurance, Health CareRetrospective StudiesThailandCost savingDosage adjustmentPharmacist interventionRenal impairmentThailand

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.