Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32221824›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2020

The role of clinical pharmacist trainees in medication reconciliation process at hospital admission.

Qian Guo, Hui Guo, Junli Song, Donghong Yin, Yan Song, Shuyun Wang, Xiaoxia Li, Jinju Duan

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Qian Guo *Department of Pharmacy, Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, No.382, Wuyi Road, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Hui Guo *Department of Pharmacy, Shanxi Cardiovascular Disease Hospital, Taiyuan, China.
Junli SongDepartment of Pharmacy, Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, No.382, Wuyi Road, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Donghong YinDepartment of Pharmacy, Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, No.382, Wuyi Road, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Yan SongDepartment of Pharmacy, Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, No.382, Wuyi Road, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Shuyun WangDepartment of Pharmacy, Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, No.382, Wuyi Road, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Xiaoxia LiDepartment of Pharmacy, Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, No.382, Wuyi Road, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China.
Jinju DuanDepartment of Pharmacy, Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, No.382, Wuyi Road, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China. duanjinju@163.com.
Shanxi Medical University · CNSecond Hospital of Shanxi Medical University · CNShanxi Cardiovascular Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Medication discrepancies are a common occurrence following hospital admission and carry the potential for causing harm. However, little is known about the prevalence and potential risk factors involved in medication discrepancies in China. Objective To determine the frequency of medication discrepancies and the associated risk factors and evaluate the potential harmsof errors prevented by pharmacist trainees performing medication reconciliation process. Setting A tertiary hospital in Shanxi, China. Method Medication reconciliation was conducted at admission to four clinical departments including cardiology, nephrology, endocrinology and pneumology department between 2019 Feb 1st and 2019 Aug 31st by clinical pharmacist trainees. All unintentional medication discrepancies were presented to the expert panel to evaluate. Associations between unintentional medication discrepancies and various factors were examined. Main outcome measure The primary outcome was the prevalence of unintentional medication discrepancies as well as the associated risk factors. Results Overall, 331 patients were included (mean age 59.7 ± 15.2 years; 176 men). The reconciliation process identified 511 drug discrepancies, 98 of which were unintentional medication discrepancies; these occurred in 74 patients. The most common unintentional medication discrepancies type was omission (40.8%), followed by incorrect dose (25.5%), and 73.5% could have caused patients moderate to significant harm and complications. 5 or more drugs and 2 or more chronic diseases at admission associated with unintentional medication discrepancies in a logistic regression analysis. Conclusion Medication reconciliation performed by pharmacist trainees upon admission can reduce unintentional medication discrepancies. Patients taking 5 or more drugs and experiencing more than two chronic diseases were found to be particularly at risk.

Indexed as

Professional RoleAdultAgedChinaFemaleHospitals, TeachingHumansMaleMedication ErrorsMedication ReconciliationMiddle AgedPatient AdmissionPharmacistsPharmacy ResidenciesPharmacy Service, HospitalProspective StudiesChinaHospital admissionMedication discrepancyMedication reconciliationPharmacist traineePrevalenceRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID32221824
OpenAlexW3012980380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.