Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32221811›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2020

Physical function in patients with resectable cancer of the pancreas and liver-a systematic review.

Linda O'Neill, Sophie Reynolds, Gráinne Sheill, Emer Guinan, David Mockler, Justin Geoghegan, Kevin Conlon, John V Reynolds, Juliette Hussey

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Linda O'NeillDiscipline of Physiotherapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. oneilll8@tcd.ie.
Sophie ReynoldsSchool of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Gráinne SheillDiscipline of Physiotherapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Emer GuinanSchool of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
David MocklerJohn Stearne Library, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Justin GeogheganDepartment of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Kevin ConlonDepartment of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
John V ReynoldsDepartment of Surgery, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Juliette HusseyDiscipline of Physiotherapy, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, the University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Trinity College Dublin · IESt. Vincent's University Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSurgery is the only potentially curative treatment for pancreatic and liver cancer. However, even in high-volume centres, surgical resection is associated with significant morbidity with resultant physical decline. This systematic review explored physical function and its' implications in the management of resectable cancer of the pancreas and liver.

methodsEMBASE, Medline OVID, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched up to June 2019 using a predefined search strategy. Screening of titles, abstracts, and full texts, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment was performed independently by two reviewers. A third reviewer resolved disagreements by consensus.

resultsSixteen studies with a total of 1224 participants were included. Heterogeneity of the literature prevented a meta-analysis. Physical function across the pancreatic/liver cancer trajectory has been under investigated. The relationship between physical function and pancreatic/liver cancer resection outcome remains unclear, although anaerobic threshold appears the strongest predictor of postoperative outcomes. Conclusions regarding the impact of rehabilitative interventions on physical function were limited due to risk of bias concerns.

conclusionsHigh-quality evidence regarding the implications of physical function in resectable pancreatic and liver cancers is lacking. Well-designed trials are required to examine physical function across the pancreatic/liver cancer continuum and to measure the impact of rehabilitation on physical function. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: As survival rates for pancreatic and liver cancer slowly improve a greater understanding of the impact of these cancers and their treatments on physical function, and the potential impact of rehabilitative interventions for survivors is required.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCancer SurvivorsFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic NeoplasmsSurvival AnalysisCardiopulmonary exercise testLiver CancerPancreatic CancerPhysical functionSurgical resection

Identifiers

PMID32221811
OpenAlexW3013160409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.