ArticleInternational ophthalmology2020
Patients' perception of glaucoma diagnosis practice: Results from a survey of glaucoma patients in North India.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study assesses the practice patterns of diagnosing ophthalmologists, as reported by glaucoma patients attending specialty glaucoma clinics in urban and rural areas of North India, for a second opinion.
methodsProspective cross-sectional study using a structured interview-based survey was conducted from 1 November 2011 to 31 October 2012 on patients attending two specialty glaucoma care facilities in North India. Both clinics were in North India; however, one was rural (Kaithal) and one was urban (Delhi). Patients were asked through descriptions of machines and processes, regarding practice patterns of their glaucoma diagnosing ophthalmologists. The interview was conducted by ophthalmic assistants in tune with the vernacular of the region, in a language understood by the interviewee.
resultsA total of 1506 patients consented to participate in the survey. The majority of patients reported undergoing tests for intraocular pressure measurement; however, 56-60% of these tests were carried out by the non-contact tonometer. More than 90% of patients reported no knowledge regarding the type and severity of the glaucoma they suffered from, and even less reported undergoing gonioscopy (3.6% Karnal and 16% Delhi). 84-86% patients who underwent perimetry reported undergoing at least some digital imaging of the optic disc.
conclusionsBetter counselling of, and communication with, the patient would help increase their awareness regarding their condition and the care required. This has the potential to enable better compliance with and adherence to treatment. Standardized training of ophthalmologists to improve clinical diagnosis of glaucoma would also go a long way.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.