ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2020
Anatomical evaluation of the craniovertebral junction on cone-beam computed tomography images.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Morphometric Evaluation of the Craniovertebral Junction Using Computed Tomography: A Sex-Based Analysis of 500 Adults.BioMed research international · 2026Article
- A new golden ratio for foramen magnum in pre- and post-adolescent children.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cranio-cervical abnormalities in moderate-to-severe osteogenesis imperfecta - Genotypic and phenotypic determinants.Orthodontics & craniofacial research · 2024Article
- Measuring the shape and dimensions of normal the bony structures in the craniovertebral junction from computed tomography images of the pediatric age group.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2022Article
- Anatomical Evaluation of the Foramen Magnum on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images and Review of Literature.Cureus · 2021Article
- Radiologic evaluation of the fossa navicularis: incidence, morphometric features, and clinical implications.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2021Article
- Morphometric evaluation of the temporomandibular joint on cone-beam computed tomography.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2021Article
- Morphometric analysis of some important parameters for the transoral approach to the occipito-atlanto-axial region: MDCT study.Journal of craniovertebral junction & spineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThere are many craniometric measurements that are used in evaluating craniovertebral junction (CVJ) pathologies such as basilar invagination, atlantoaxial dislocation and platybasia. Therefore, it is important to determine the normal reference range of the craniometric measurements. This study aims to determine the morphometric reference values of the bony structures in the CVJ from cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of a group of South Eastern Anatolian population. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe CBCT images of 300 individuals were retrospectively evaluated. 14 parameters on midsagittal and 2 parameters on the coronal plane were studied. The data were statistically evaluated.
resultsMeasurement results were found as follows; the distances between odontoid process (OP) and McGregor line as 0.31 ± 3.22 mm, OP and Chamberlain line 1.06 ± 3.22 mm, OP and McRae line 5.30 ± 1.59 mm, OP and Fischgold digastric line 8.70 ± 4.12 mm, OP and Fischgold bimastoid line - 5.15 ± 4.86 mm, length of McRae line 35.58 ± 2.52 mm, atlantodental interval 1.28 ± 0.48 mm, posterior atlantodental interval 19.54 ± 2.24 mm, basion axial interval 4.01 ± 1.83 mm, basion dental interval 4.92 ± 1.77 mm, length of Modified Ranawat line 28.66 ± 2.38 mm, length of Redlund-Johnell line 35.11 ± 4.09 mm, clivus canal angle 157.62° ± 11.85°, Welcher basal angle 130.83° ± 6.29°, craniocervical tilt 126.98° ± 12.24° and Powers ratio as 0.72 ± 0.06.
conclusionIn this study, the morphometric values were evaluated according to age and gender in individuals who did not have any radiologic anomalies. The normal reference ranges may be useful for researchers who are researching pathology in this region. It is recommended to conduct further studies with different populations to determine the normal reference range.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32221664What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.