Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32221627›Full record

ReviewDer Internist2020

[Improved patient safety through a clinical decision support system in laboratory medicine].

F Eckelt, J Remmler, T Kister, M Wernsdorfer, H Richter, M Federbusch, M Adler, A Kehrer, M Voigt, C Cundius and 3 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Internist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

F EckeltInstitut für Laboratoriumsmedizin, Klinische Chemie und Molekulare Diagnostik, Universitätsmedizin Leipzig, Paul-List-Str. 13-15, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
J RemmlerInstitut für Laboratoriumsmedizin, Klinische Chemie und Molekulare Diagnostik, Universitätsmedizin Leipzig, Paul-List-Str. 13-15, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
T KisterInstitut für Laboratoriumsmedizin, Klinische Chemie und Molekulare Diagnostik, Universitätsmedizin Leipzig, Paul-List-Str. 13-15, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
M WernsdorferInstitut für Laboratoriumsmedizin, Klinische Chemie und Molekulare Diagnostik, Universitätsmedizin Leipzig, Paul-List-Str. 13-15, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
H RichterKrankenhäuser Grimma und Wurzen, Muldentalkliniken GmbH Gemeinnützige Gesellschaft, Grimma/Wurzen, Deutschland.
M FederbuschInstitut für Laboratoriumsmedizin, Klinische Chemie und Molekulare Diagnostik, Universitätsmedizin Leipzig, Paul-List-Str. 13-15, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
M AdlerXantas AG, Leipzig, Deutschland.
A KehrerXantas AG, Leipzig, Deutschland.
M VoigtInformationsmanagement, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland.
C CundiusInformationsmanagement, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland.
J TelleXantas AG, Leipzig, Deutschland.
J ThieryInstitut für Laboratoriumsmedizin, Klinische Chemie und Molekulare Diagnostik, Universitätsmedizin Leipzig, Paul-List-Str. 13-15, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
T KaiserInstitut für Laboratoriumsmedizin, Klinische Chemie und Molekulare Diagnostik, Universitätsmedizin Leipzig, Paul-List-Str. 13-15, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland. thorsten.kaiser@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaboratory diagnostics are essential for diagnosis, initiation of therapy, and monitoring of patients. Laboratory results that are overlooked or incorrectly interpreted lead to adverse events and endanger patient safety. Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) may facilitate appropriate interpretation of results and subsequent medical response.

objectivesThe research project on digital laboratory medicine (AMPEL) aims at developing a CDSS based on laboratory diagnostics, which supports practitioners in ensuring the necessary medical consequences. MATERIALS AND

methodsA literature review of CDSSs describes the current state of research. The research project AMPEL is presented with its objectives, challenges, and first results. Furthermore, the development of a framework and reporting system is illustrated through the clinical example of severe hypokalemia. RESULTS AND

conclusionThrough interdisciplinary development and constant optimization, a specific CDSS with high acceptance among clinicians was developed. Initial results in the case of severe hypokalemia show a positive effect on patient care. Thereby, more complex frameworks such as sepsis diagnostics or acute coronary syndrome are implemented. The limited availability of standardized and digital clinical data is challenging. In addition to the application of classic decision trees in CDSS, the use of machine learning offers a promising perspective for future developments.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalPatient SafetyDiagnostic Tests, RoutineHumansClinical decision supportMachine learningMedical errorsReporting systemsSevere hypokalemia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.