Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32221601›Full record

ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2021

Predictors of implementation in the Faith, Activity, and Nutrition dissemination and implementation study: application of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) in a statewide initiative.

Sara Wilcox, Danielle E Jake-Schoffman, Ruth P Saunders, Deborah Kinnard, Andrew T Kaczynski, Brent Hutto, Katherine L James

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Preliminary effects of a rural skin cancer prevention intervention for youths.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sara WilcoxPrevention Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
Danielle E Jake-SchoffmanDepartment of Health Education and Behavior, College of Health and Human Performance, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Ruth P SaundersPrevention Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
Deborah KinnardPrevention Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
Andrew T KaczynskiPrevention Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
Brent HuttoPrevention Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
Katherine L JamesSouth Carolina Conference of the United Methodist Church, Columbia, SC.
University of South Carolina · USFirst United Methodist Church · USUniversity of Florida Health · US

Funding

Faith, Activity, and Nutrition: Dissemination in Underserved CommunitiesU48DP005000 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI WILCOX, SARA · 2014 to 2019
$5.9M
ACL HHS U48DP005000NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP005000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Faith-based organizations, with broad reach and trust, are well-positioned to promote health. The purpose of the study was to examine 12-month implementation and its predictors in the statewide Faith, Activity, and Nutrition (FAN) dissemination and implementation (D&I) study. Churches (n = 93; 42% predominantly African American) in the [South Carolina] Conference of the United Methodist Church trained by Community Health Advisors participated in the study. Church FAN coordinators (n = 92) completed implementation surveys regarding opportunities, policies, messages, and pastor support for physical activity (PA) and healthy eating (HE) at baseline and 12 months. FAN coordinators and pastors (n = 93) completed CFIR-based measures at baseline, immediate post-training, and 12 months. Repeated measures ANOVAs tested change in PA and HE implementation composite scores; Cohen's d indicated magnitude of change. Mixed model linear regression tested whether CFIR items predicted 12-month implementation, controlling for baseline implementation. PA (d = 1.42) and HE (d = 2.05) implementation increased significantly over time. PA and HE implementation were significantly greater in predominantly African American (versus White) congregations, and HE implementation was greater in churches with <500 members. FAN coordinators' ratings of the inner setting (networks/communication, culture, tension for change, organizational rewards, readiness, and congregant needs) and implementation process (engaging opinion leaders and champions) domains were most predictive of implementation outcomes. Few pastor ratings related to implementation outcomes. This study identified constructs, guided by CFIR, that may be important for understanding PA and HE implementation in churches. Future studies will need to test them for replication. Greater changes in implementation outcomes among African American churches underscores the potential of promoting health equity through this setting.

Indexed as

Faith-Based OrganizationsHealth PromotionBlack or African AmericanDiet, HealthyExerciseHumansChurchesDisseminationFaith-basedImplementationNutritionPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID32221601
PMCPMC8496554
OpenAlexW3013946331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.