Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32221533›Full record

ArticleCarcinogenesis2020

Cooperation of genes in HPV16 E6/E7-dependent cervicovaginal carcinogenesis trackable by endoscopy and independent of exogenous estrogens or carcinogens.

Paula Böttinger, Karin Schreiber, Elizabeth Hyjek, Thomas Krausz, Michael T Spiotto, Madeline Steiner, Christian Idel, Heather Booras, Gabriele Beck-Engeser, Jessie Riederer and 12 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Carcinogenesis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Paula BöttingerDepartment of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Karin SchreiberDepartment of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Elizabeth HyjekDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Thomas KrauszDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Michael T SpiottoDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Madeline SteinerDepartment of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Christian IdelDepartment of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Heather BoorasDepartment of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Gabriele Beck-EngeserDepartment of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jessie RiedererDepartment of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Gerald WillimskyInstitute of Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Buch, Berlin, Germany.
Steven P WolfDepartment of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Theodore KarrisonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Elizabeth JensenDepartment of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ralph R WeichselbaumDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Yusuke NakamuraProject for Immunogenomics, Cancer Precision Medicine Center, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Poh Yin YewDepartment of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Paul F LambertMcArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research/Department of Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Takeshi KuritaDepartment of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Kazuma KiyotaniProject for Immunogenomics, Cancer Precision Medicine Center, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Matthias LeisegangInstitute of Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Buch, Berlin, Germany.
Hans SchreiberDepartment of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Chicago · USJapanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JPCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEChicago Department of Public Health · USDeutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung · DEThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Visualizing EBV and HCMV DNA Dynamics During InfectionP01CA022443 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI WILLIAM M. SUGDEN · 1985 to 2026
$53.1M
Defining Drivers of HPV-associated CarcinogenesisR35CA210807 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Paul F. Lambert · 2017 to 2026
$9.2M
PATHOBIOLOGY OF MYELOMA AND ANTI-IDIOTYPIC IMMUNITYR01CA022677 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI SCHREIBER, HANS · 1985 to 2024
$6.3M
Viral Replication Pathways During Oral Tumorigenesis and Response to TherapyR01DE027445 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI SPIOTTO, MICHAEL T · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA022443NCI NIH HHS R01 CA022677NCI NIH HHS R35 CA210807NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE027445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is necessary but insufficient for progression of epithelial cells from dysplasia to carcinoma-in situ (CIS) to invasive cancer. The combination of mutant cellular and viral oncogenes that regulate progression of cervical cancer (CC) remains unclear. Using combinations of HPV16 E6/E7 (E+), mutant Kras (mKras) (K+) and/or loss of Pten (P-/-), we generated autochthonous models of CC without exogenous estrogen, carcinogen or promoters. Furthermore, intravaginal instillation of adenoCre virus enabled focal activation of the oncogenes/inactivation of the tumor suppressor gene. In P+/+ mice, E6/E7 alone (P+/+E+K-) failed to cause premalignant changes, while mKras alone (P+/+E-K+) caused persistent mucosal abnormalities in about one-third of mice, but no cancers. To develop cancer, P+/+ mice needed both E6/E7 and mKras expression. Longitudinal endoscopies of P+/+E+K+ mice predicted carcinoma development by detection of mucosal lesions, found on an average of 23 weeks prior to death, unlike longitudinal quantitative PCRs of vaginal lavage samples from the same mice. Endoscopy revealed that individual mice differed widely in the time required for mucosal lesions to appear after adenoCre and in the time required for these lesions to progress to cancer. These cancers developed in the transition zone that extends, unlike in women, from the murine cervix to the distal vagina. The P-/-E+K+ genotype led to precipitous cancer development within a few weeks and E6/E7-independent cancer development occurred in the P-/-E-K+ genotype. In the P-/-E+K- genotype, mice only developed CIS. Thus, distinct combinations of viral and cellular oncogenes are involved in distinct steps in cervical carcinogenesis.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinogenesisCarcinogensEndoscopyEstrogensFemaleHuman papillomavirus 16MiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutMutationOncogene Proteins, ViralPapillomavirus E7 ProteinsPapillomavirus InfectionsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)PTEN PhosphohydrolaseCarcinogensE6 protein, Human papillomavirus type 16EstrogensHras protein, mouseoncogene protein E7, Human papillomavirus type 16Oncogene Proteins, ViralPapillomavirus E7 ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)PTEN PhosphohydrolasePten protein, mouseRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32221533
PMCPMC7896110
OpenAlexW3013680233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.